Çakar, TunaHohenberger, Annette2024-09-082024-09-082024979835038897897983503889612165-0608https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU61531.2024.10601017https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/2344This study was conducted to explore how the brain processes decisions about identity, employing event-related potentials (ERPs) as a measure. The aim was to ascertain if the EEG/ERP technique could be used to monitor the cognitive processing of identity judgments as they happen. The investigation focused on comparing two groups of statements: those that used the concept of 'same' and those that used 'different'. The researchers hypothesized that there would be notable differences in the ERPs, particularly around the 400-millisecond mark, correlating with the reaction time disparities observed behaviorally. The ERP data revealed that the 'different' statements generated a unique N400 response when contrasted with the 'same' statements, implying that the participants' cognitive responses to these two types of judgments were not the same.trinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessIdentity JudgmentsEeg/ErpSameDifferentExperimental DesignNeuroscienceEvaluating Electrophysiological Responses Due To Identity JudgmentsAynılık Yargılarının Neden Olduğu Elektrofizyolojik Tepkilerin DeğerlendirilmesiConference Object10.1109/SIU61531.2024.106010172-s2.0-85200845646