Birgili, BengiAydın, UtkunKurban, Caroline Fell2025-08-012025-08-012025Birgili, B., Aydın, U., & Fell Kurban, C. (2025). Investigating the Appropriateness of a Course Evaluation Model: Preservice Teachers’ Flipped Learning Experience . Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, (43), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.43.21052148-2624https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.43.2105https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/1332773/investigating-the-appropriateness-of-a-course-evaluation-model-preservice-teachers-flipped-learning-experienceParlett and Hamilton’s (1972) Illuminative Evaluation Model (IEM) was adopted to research course evaluation in flipped learning environments. An integrated data set, including teaching videos, interviews from 17 preservice teachers, and course materials, was collected and analyzed in an educational sciences course. Both quantitative and qualitative data showed that this model, within its learning milieu and instructional systems aspects, had the potential to be a suitable method for instructors to evaluate the quality of their flipped courses. These relationships between the learning milieu and instructional systems provide evidence of the complexity of evaluation. This study demonstrates how the IEM helps uncover the design of a flipped educational sciences course and offers a suitable model for flipped course evaluation. Finally, the implications of this study for general instructional design are discussed.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCourse EvaluationHigher EducationFlipped LearningInterpretive ParadigmIlluminative Evaluation ModelArticle10.14689/enad.43.2105