Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1939
Browse
5 results
Search Results
Article Gerilen Türk-rus İlişkileri Bağlamında Nato’nun Rolü ve Etkisi Ne Olabilir?(2016) Kibaroğlu, MustafaTürk - Rus İlişkileriArticle Dağlık Karabağ Sorunu: Ermenistan için Çözümsüz Çatışma Olmasının Nedenleri(Milli Savunma Üniversitesi, 2015) Güleç, CansuThe conflict between Armenian and Azerbaijan around Nagorno-Karabakh was violent between 1988 and 1994. Nevertheless, Nagorno-Karabakh dispute is regarded as one of the frozen conflicts, which has been witnessed for many years. In order to stop and contain the conflict, other states and international organizations advocated peaceful settlement. However, the problem went through a number of phases and has not reached a final solution despite of many years of negotiation under the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group. In this context, the objective of this paper is to understand the main impeding factors that prevent peaceful resolution and establishment of a long-lasting peace for Armenia. As a framework to analyze the case of Armenia-Azerbaijan dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh, this paper uses the "constructivist theory", which explains national histories and identities as fluid, evolving, and formed over time, and which claims that it is mainly social relationships between agents, structures, and institutions that can lead to ethnic conflicts. Contrary to the primordialist approach, which treats ethnic groups as concrete and independent entities that exist inherently, the explanation of intractability within a constructivist framework constitutes the main difference. In view of this, government policies are also constructed according to interstate perceptions, expectations and the concepts developed towards themselves and others. As a result, rather than only including one-dimensional "ancient hatred" paradigm; "the problem of security", "image of enemy", "other countries" involvement with having interests in the region", and most importantly "internal politics" can be regarded as the contributors to intractability for Armenia.Article Citation - WoS: 1Citation - Scopus: 1Us Policies Adrift in a Levant in Turmoil(Stradigma, 2018) Özel, Soli; Görmüş, EvrimThe Levant has constituted one of the core areas of interest for US foreign policy since the Second World War. The aim of this article is to shed light on the US policies towards the Levant, mostly during the last two American administrations, to understand how the vicissitudes of the region and of American politics made Washington’s policy towards the Levant look biased, at times incompetent, and most importantly inconsistent. This article examines the changes in approach to the region as a whole from one administration to the next on issues such as the protection of Israel’s sovereignty, supporting friendly regimes, fighting terrorism, and containing Iran. The hesitations and shifts in policy towards Syria are given a longer treatment as they speak both to the yet not finalized American policy towards the Levant but also to show how the US has shifted track and moved away from unseating President Assad to focus more on containing and if possible rolling over Iran.Article 2019 Yılında Türk Dış Politikasının Manevra Alanı Genişleyebilir(BİLGESAM, 2019) Kibaroğlu, MustafaBu yazımızda, Türkiye’nin ABD, Rusya, AB ve İran ile olan ilişkilerinde hassas bir denge yakalaması yoluyla, dış politika ve güvenlik konularında kendini daha avantajlı bir konuma getirmesine katkı yapabilecek siyasi, iktisadi ve askeri unsurları ele alacağız.Article İklim Güvenliği Kavramının Türkiye İklim Politikasındaki Yeri(Alternatif Politika, 2017) Gönenç, Defne; Kibaroğlu, AyşegülThis article elaborates on the concept of climate security as a subfield of environmental security research agenda, and investigatesthe place of climate security concept in Turkey’s climate policies.First, the evolution of the environmental security concept in theliterature is elaborated. Subsequently, climate security discourse,as a sub-field of environmental security, is examined. The conceptof climate security is explained with examples from the UnitedNations’, United States’ and European Union’s official statementsand discourses. Lastly, the place of climate security discourse inTurkey’s climate policies is investigated. By using qualitativecontent analysis method, the use of climate security discourse inthe official documents of the Ministry of Environment and UrbanPlanning of Turkey, Turkey’s official speeches in the SecurityCouncil, and two significant newspapers in the country areanalyzed.