Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1939
Browse
15 results
Search Results
Other War as the True Adversary and Türkiye’s Pivotal Role in Forging Peace(SETA Foundation, 2024) Çağlar, BarışThe central thesis of this article depends on deterrence theory and posits that nuclear war, rather than any specific nation or faction, constitutes the true adversary in the Russia-Ukraine conflict and that averting nuclear escalation must be prioritized above all else. After establishing the rationale for this position, the commentary offers a critical analysis of both Western and Russian policies, highlighting their role in intensifying the conflict without sufficiently accounting for the risks of nuclear confrontation. As an alternative peaceful path, the article examines the Turkish approach as a concise applied case study, emphasizing its balanced diplomatic and military engagement with both Ukraine and Russia. Through its promotion of dialogue and facilitation of peace negotiations, Türkiye exemplifies a strategic approach to conflict resolution that aims not only to prevent further escalation —especially the threat of nuclear conflict— but also to pave the way toward sustainable peace. © 2024, SETA Foundation. All rights reserved.Other Exploring Environmental Justice in Small-Scale Hydroelectricity Power Plant Development in Rural Turkey(Centre for Water Law, Policy and Science, University of Dundee., 2016) Kibaroğlu, AyşegülAyşegül Kibaroğlu acted as an external examiner for R. Caner Sayan’s PhD thesis “Exploring Environmental Justice in Small-Scale Hydroelectricity Power Plant Development in Rural Turkey,” Viva Voce examination 25 March 2016, Centre for Water Law, Policy and Science, University of Dundee.Other The European Union as a Distinctive Actor in Global Climate Change Policy(Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Uluslararası İlişkiler Anabilim Dalı, 2015) Bağcı, Hüseyin; Kibaroğlu, AyşegülThis dissertation focus on the relationship with the international climate change policy and key actors’ positions on global climate negotiations. The main aim of this dissertation is to show that the European Union takes a different position than other international actors in terms of international climate change negotiation and policy. This distinction stems from the founding philosophy of the European Union and its environmentalist tradition. The argument of this dissertation is that whereas nation-states in general, great emitter states in particular, emphasize their national interests regarding climate change issues, the EU behaves in different way. This different behavior stems from the factors of ‘logic of action,’ ‘supranational decision-making mechanism’ and ‘its concern of spreading the EU standards.’ Despite the fact that there are different views on climate change policy among the EU members and the EU (because it is itself a great emitting body), these factors enable the EU to behave differently than other actors in the international climate change process.Other Why Is Turkey a Hub for Global Intelligence Agencies?(TRT World, 2018) Çağlar, BarışFrom Cold War rivalries, to the rise of global terror networks, international players have historically used Turkey as a stage for their covert operations.Other Why Turkey Chose, and Then Rejected, a Chinese Air-Defense Missile(2016) Kibaroğlu, Mustafa; Sazak, Selim C.Ankara's decisions say a lot about what Turkey wants from the U.S. and NATO, if only the West will listen. When Turkey announced its intention to buy a Chinese missile system in 2013, many in the West believed Ankara was veering away from NATO. But look at that decision—and its recent reversal— through Turkish eyes, and the situation looks a lot different. Ultimately, the episode should teach its Western allies about what Turkey really wants, and doesn’t want.Other End To Nuke Deal May Start ‘era Worse Than Cold War: Expert(Hurriyet Daily News, 2019) Kibaroğlu, MustafaThe US announcement at the beginning of the month that it is suspending its compliance with the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty can lead to the demise of an arms control regime opening the way to an era of uncertainty with devastating consequences said a scholar. In the resulting tension between Moscow and Washington the parties could opt to give each other messages via limited scale crisis and Turkey risks to be one of the setting areas of these crisis warned Professor Mustafa Kibaroğlu.Other Prof. Dr. Kibaroğlu: Hava Savunma Sistemi Türkiye için Acil İhtiyaç(Star, 2017) Kibaroğlu, MustafaTürkiye’nin hali hazırda kısıtlı sayıda ve kısıtlı kapasitede hava savunma sistemleri var. Ancak, güncel ve gelecekteki tehdidin boyutları ile “sürpriz saldırı” ihtimali dikkate alındığında kesinlikle yeterli olmayacaktır.Other Transatlantic Missile Defense Architecture: Defining the Right Threat Set(Atlantic Council, 2015) Kibaroğlu, MustafaThis panel cover the following topics: How has the air defence environment changed in light of Russia’s assertiveness? Should transatlantic MD focus on two threats: Russia and Iran? How does this affect transatlantic MD operations and plans?Other Good News From Vienna Is a Relief To Ankara(Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2015) Kibaroğlu, Mustafa; Sazak, Selim C.After months of harrowing negotiations, the nuclear talks in Vienna have finally succeeded, marking the most significant accord between Iran and major world powers since Iran's Islamic revolution in 1979. Absent from the festivities, however, was one country that worked hard to bring this day forth—Turkey.Other Nuclear Weapons: Not Taboo Enough(Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2015) Kibaroğlu, MustafaI wish I could argue that the world had properly absorbed the lessons of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. Unfortunately, I must argue the opposite. Why? First and foremost, large numbers of people around the world believe that dropping the atomic bombs—regardless of how catastrophic the consequences were for the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki—saved lives, perhaps millions of them, by bringing World War II to a prompt conclusion. But history doesn't substantiate this point of view. Japan had already lost much ground in the Asia-Pacific region. Europe's fascist regimes had fallen; the war had ended in Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East; and Japan was left to fight its enemies alone. Under such circumstances the Japanese Empire couldn't have prolonged the war much longer in any case.