PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1928
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Article Citation - WoS: 7Citation - Scopus: 8The Use of Decomposition Methods in Real-World Treatment Benefits Evaluation for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Initiating Different Injectable Therapies: Findings From the Initiator Study(Elsevier Science Inc, 2017-12-01) Ke, Xuehua; Buysman, Erin; Wei, Wenhui; Xie, Lin; Grabner, Michael; Brekke, Lee; Başer, OnurBackground: Determining characteristics of patients likely to benefit from a particular treatment could help physicians set personalized targets. OBJECTIVES: To use decomposition methodology on real-world data to identify the relative contributions of treatment effects and patients' baseline characteristics. METHODS: Decomposition analyses were performed on data from the Initiation of New Injectable Treatment Introduced after Antidiabetic Therapy with Oral-only Regimens (INITIATOR) study, a real-world study of patients with type 2 diabetes started on insulin glargine (GLA) or liraglutide (LIRA). These analyses investigated relative contributions of differences in baseline characteristics and treatment effects to observed differences in 1-year outcomes for reduction in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and treatment persistence. RESULTS: The greater HbA1c reduction seen with GLA compared with LIRA (-1.39% vs. -0.74%) was primarily due to differences in baseline characteristics (HbA1c and endocrinologist as prescribing physician; P < 0.050). Patients with baseline HbA1c of 9.0% or more or evidence of diagnosis codes related to mental illness achieved greater HbA1c reductions with GLA, whereas patients with baseline polypharmacy (6-10 classes) or hypogylcemia achieved greater reductions with LIRA. Decomposition analyses also showed that the higher persistence seen with GLA (65% vs. 49%) was mainly caused by differences in treatment effects (P < 0.001). Patients 65 years and older, those with HbA1c of 9.0% or more, those taking three oral antidiabetes drugs, and those with polypharmacy of more than 10 classes had higher persistence with GLA; patients 18 to 39 years and those with HbA1c of 7.0% to less than 8.0% had higher persistence with LIRA. CONCLUSIONS: Although decomposition does not demonstrate causal relationships, this method could be useful for examining the source of differences in outcomes between treatments in a real-world setting and could help physicians identify patients likely to respond to a particular treatment. Copyright (C) 2017 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Article Citation - WoS: 18Citation - Scopus: 18Adding Rapid-Acting Insulin or Glp-1 Receptor Agonist To Basal Insulin: Outcomes in a Community Setting(Amer Assoc Clinical Endocrinologists, 2015) Dalal, Mehul R; DiGenio, Andres; Xie, Lin; Başer, OnurTo evaluate real-world outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)receiving basal insulin, who initiate add-on therapy with a rapid-acting insulin (RAI) or aglucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist.Data were extracted retrospectively from a U.S. health claims database. Adults withT2DM on basal insulin who added an RAI (basal+RAI) or GLP-1 receptor agonist (basal+GLP-1) were included. Propensity score matching (1 up to 3 ratio) was used to control for differencesin baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and health resource utilization. Endpointsincluded prevalence of hypoglycemia, pancreatic events, all-cause and diabetes-relatedresource utilization, and costs at 1 year follow-up. Overall, 6,718 matched patients were included: 5,013 basal+RAI and 1,705basal+GLP1. Patients in both groups experienced a similar proportion of any hypoglycemicevent (P = .4079). Hypoglycemic events leading to hospitalization were higher in the basal+RAIcohort (2.7% vs. 1.8%; P = .0444). The basal+GLP-1 cohort experienced fewer all-cause(13.55% vs. 18.61%; P<.0001) and diabetes-related hospitalizations (11.79% vs. 15.68%;P<.0001). The basal+GLP-1 cohort had lower total all-cause health care costs ($18,413 vs.$20,821; P = .0002), but similar diabetes-related costs ($9,134 vs. $8,985; P<.0001) comparedwith the basal+RAI cohort. Add-on therapy with a GLP-1 receptor agonist in T2DM patients receiving basalinsulin was associated with fewer hospitalizations and lower total all-cause costs compared withadd-on therapy using a RAI, and could be considered an alternative to a RAI in certain patientswith T2DM, who do not achieve effective glycemic control with basal insulin.