Başoğlu, Başak
Loading...
Profile URL
Name Variants
Başak Başoğlu
Job Title
Email Address
basoglub@mef.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
05. Faculty of Law
Status
Former Staff
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID
Sustainable Development Goals
1
NO POVERTY
0
Research Products
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
0
Research Products
8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
1
Research Products
9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
0
Research Products
10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES
0
Research Products
6
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION
0
Research Products
5
GENDER EQUALITY
1
Research Products
17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
0
Research Products
11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
0
Research Products
2
ZERO HUNGER
0
Research Products
16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
2
Research Products
12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
0
Research Products
14
LIFE BELOW WATER
0
Research Products
15
LIFE ON LAND
0
Research Products
4
QUALITY EDUCATION
0
Research Products
13
CLIMATE ACTION
0
Research Products
7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
0
Research Products
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
Documents
0
Citations
0
Scholarly Output
16
Articles
6
Views / Downloads
4302/37231
Supervised MSc Theses
0
Supervised PhD Theses
0
WoS Citation Count
0
Scopus Citation Count
0
WoS h-index
0
Scopus h-index
0
Patents
0
Projects
0
WoS Citations per Publication
0.00
Scopus Citations per Publication
0.00
Open Access Source
6
Supervised Theses
0
| Journal | Count |
|---|---|
| 1. Ulusal Şiddeti Anlamak Kongresi | 1 |
| Aile Hukuku Pratik Çalışmalar | 1 |
| American Society Of Comparative Law Younger Comparativists Committee 6th Annual Conference | 1 |
| Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi | 1 |
| İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi | 1 |
Current Page: 1 / 3
Scopus Quartile Distribution
Quartile distribution chart data is not available
Competency Cloud
16 results
Scholarly Output Search Results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 16
Conference Object Book Part Aile hukuku pratik çalışmalar(Vedat Kitapçılık, 2020) Başoğlu, Başak; Kapancı, Kadir BerkBu çalışma, Aile Hukukunun belli başlı teknik konularının öğrenciler tarafından kavranmasını kolaylaştırabilmek amacıyla hazırlanmış.Çalışma içinde yer verilen olay örneklerindeki sorunlar, öğretideki ve yargı kararlarındaki temel yaklaşımlar ve tartışmalar aktarılarak cevaplanmış, yer yer anlamayı kolaylaştırıcı tablolar da içeriğe eklemiş. Bu çalışma, Aile Hukuku bahsinin kavranmasında bir temel kaynak değildir; olsa olsa vazgeçilemez özellikteki teori kitaplarını destekleyen bir yardımcı kaynaktır. Bu nedenledir ki, öğrencilerin Aile Hukuku çalışmaları sırasında yararlanacakları temel kaynaklar ile daha derinlikli araştırmalar yapmalarını sağlayacak eserlere ilişkin kapsamlı bir bibliyografya çalışmasına da bu kitapta yer verilmiş.Conference Object A bridge “Maybe” too far: Granting legal personality to animals?(University of Antwerp, 2021) Başoğlu, Başak; Kapancı, Kadir BerkTurkish legal system, like all other legal systems is developed by persons and thus, the >main distinction is made between persons and objects (persona and res). According to thistraditional distinction, animals which are not humans but being “other” species in our World,have mostly been considered as objects and thus subject to personal property. In these personorientedlegal systems, including the Turkish one, even the rules relating to animals essentiallyaims to protect the owner of the animals, but not the animals themselves.However, today this paradigm is slowly challenged as “right to life” (to some extent) isgranted to animals under many legal systems (for instance under the Turkish Law on Protectionof Animals dated 24 June 2004). Nevertheless, the boundaries of this right are the interests ofthe people. Unfortunately, the concepts of animal dignity and right to life do not provide enoughprotection to animals. But what could be the solution to better protect the animals? Grantinglegal personality to the animals? Perhaps it is a bridge too far…Throughout the history, personality have been granted to different objects if it isbeneficial and feasible to do so. Accordingly, this paper firstly aims to evaluate whether it isbeneficial and feasible to grant legal personality -partially or as a whole- to the animals. Underthis first sub-title we will discuss as well whether granting to each and every animal a separatepersonality or a sole conceptual one to the entire nature including the animals. Secondly ourwork further targets to reconsider the traditional distinction of persons and things to provide amore specific legal status for animals. Perhaps such a reconsideration could enable us to solveanother controversial issue of our contemporary world: that is the legal status of “strong”artificial intelligence. Moreover, our discussions will comprise the analyse of the legal statusof the “ancient roman law’s slave”, considered as an object though a human being, benefitingfrom different types of legal protection at different levels, at different times. Across the saidcomparisons, at the end, we would like to reach a robust conclusion.Conference Object Çocuğun Medeni Hukuk Kuralları Çerçevesinde Şiddete Karşı Korunması (bildiri)(2015) Kapancı, Kadir Berk; Başoğlu, BaşakÖzel hukuk anlamında şiddet bir kimsenin kişi ve malvarlığı değerlerine saldırıyı ifade eder. Çocuğun bir birey olarak aile içinde veya aile dışında karşılaştığı şiddete karşı korunması önemli bir konudur ve çeşitli düzenlemelerdde özel olarak ele alınmıştır. Türk Medeni Kanunu’ndaki (TMK) bazı genel düzenlemeler de bu kapsamda kabul edilebilir. Nitekim TMK’da yer alan kişilik haklarının korunması, velayet ve –istisnai olarak- vesayete ilişkin düzenlemeler, çocuğun gerek üçüncü kişilere gerekse de yetkilerini kötüye kullandıkları durumda veli/vasiye karşı özel hukuk kuralları çerçevesinde korunmasını konu almaktadır. İşbu çalışmada, Medeni Hukukun anılan düzenlemeleri kapsamında çocuğun şiddete karşı korunmasında başvurulabilecek yollar incelenecektir.Article The Impact of Force Majeure on Contracts for the International Sale of Commercial Goods Under Art. 79 of the CISG(Istanbul Universtiy Press, 2025) Başoğlu, Başak; Kapancı, Kadir Berk; Kapancı, Kadir BerkThe United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) aims to harmonise inter0 national trade law by providing unified rules for sales contracts across its 970member countries, as of April 2025. Despite its wide adoption, the CISG’s approach to non0performance and liability differs markedly from domestic legal systems, particularly those based on civil law traditions. The CISG provides that the debtor failing to perform their obligations must compensate for the loss, unless exempted under Article 79, which introduces the concept of “impediment beyond the debtor’s control” as a basis for exemption. For this exemption to apply, the impediment must be unforeseeable, unavoidable, and the direct cause of the failure to perform. However, these criteria make its application rare in practice, while its requirements have been satisfied in only a limited number of cases. This study examines Article 79 CISG in detail, exploring its stringent criteria and the challenges it presents in practice. Furthermore, the paper will assess Article 79’s effectiveness in addressing force majeure and hardship scenarios, despite the absence of explicit references to these concepts within the CISG text.Article Çocuğun Medeni Hukuk Kuralları Çerçevesinde Şiddete Karşı Korunması(Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi, 2017) Kapancı, Kadir Berk; Başoğlu, BaşakÖzel hukuk anlamında şiddet, bir kimsenin kişi ve malvarlığı değerlerine saldırıyı ifade eder. Çocuğun bir birey olarak aile içinde veya aile dışında karşılaştığı şiddete karşı korunması önemli bir konudur ve çeşitli düzenlemelerde özel olarak ele alınmıştır. Türk Medeni Kanunu’ndaki (TMK) bazı genel düzenlemeler de bu kapsamda kabul edilebilir. Nitekim, TMK’da yer alan kişilik haklarının korunması, velayet ve -istisnai olarak- vesayete ilişkin düzenlemeler, çocuğun gerek üçüncü kişilere gerekse de yetkilerini kötüye kullandıkları durumda veli/vasiye karşı özel hukuk kuralları çerçevesinde korunmasını konu almaktadır. İşbu çalışma, Medeni Hukukun anılan düzenlemeleri kapsamında çocuğun şiddete karşı korunmasında başvurulabilecek yollar incelenecektir.Book Part The rights of the child in Turkey(Springer, 2022) Başoğlu, Başak; Kapancı, Kadir BerkChildren are the core element and the future of a society. However, they are also relatively weak and thus need to be specially protected. Turkish private law, in line with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, provides a variety of rights to children. The basic rights of the children are regulated under the Turkish Civil Code of 2002. Furthermore, the Turkish Labor Code of 2003, Turkish Penal Code of 2005, Turkish Criminal Procedural Code of 2005, Child Protection Code of 2005 and the Law on the Protection of the Family and the Prevention of Violence Against Women of 2013 also provide special rights and protective measures for children. Accordingly, this paper aims to present an overview of children’s basic rights and the protection mechanisms for children under Turkish Civil Code.Conference Object Close Link Between the Right To Specific Performance and Penalty Clauses: a Comparative Approach(2017) Kapancı, Kadir Berk; Başoğlu, BaşakIn a contractual relationship, the debtor is liable for a full and due performance. Furthermore, the parties can also agree on a penalty clause to be performed, in case where the obligation is not diligently performed. Penalty clauses are side-agreements enlarging the scope of liability of the debtor by establishing a penalty to be paid in case of breach of contract. These clauses, thus guarantee the performance by creating pressure on the debtor. These penalties are awarded even if there is no damage. On the other hand, penalty clauses are to be separated from liquidated damages clauses which are also side-agreements aiming to estimate damages in case of a possible breach of contract. In other words, such clauses simply aim to measure damages that are hard to prove once incurred. Liquidated damages clauses can easily be enforced by the courts in both civil and common law countries. However, this is not the case for penalty clauses.Article De L’execution En Nature En Droit Prive Turc(2022) Kapancı, Kadir Berk; Başoğlu, BaşakNormalement une obligation tend à l’exécution. A cet égard, l’exécution est l’accomplissement de la prestation due au créancier. Quant à l’exécution en nature, elle signifie la requête du créancier sur la même matière envers le débiteur. Pour le droit turc, qui fait partie du monde de droit civil (civil law), elle constitue, si on l’explique avec une allégorie qui y va bien, «l’épine dorsale» de l’obligation, composant non un remède mais une extension naturelle de l’obligation, c’est à dire, elle est en principe tout à fait réclamable. En fait, c’est un recours accordé au demandeur en cas de d’inexécution du contrat par le débiteur, et par lequel celui-ci peut être condamné à exécuter son engagement dans les termes précis où il l’avait contracté. Mais comment le créancier va le demander en droit si le débiteur persiste à ne pas prendre une action pour le réaliser ? La réponse est bien nette: On le lui «rappelle gentiment» avec les procédures de l’exécution forcée. Ces moyens sont tous prévus pour faire pression sur le débiteur et le déterminer à exécuter ce qu’il doit envers le créancier. Notre travail ciprès vise à expliquer les règles principales en droit turc, qui est lui-même inspiré de droit suisse, sur l’exécution forcée en nature pour tous les différents types d’obligation.Conference Object General Risk Liability Under the Turkish Code of Obligations and Its Implications in Insurance Law: Is It a "frankenstein's Monster"?(Koç Üniversitesi, 2021) Kapancı, Kadir Berk; Başoğlu, BaşakRisk liability is the strongest of all types of non-contractual liabilities. It is a strict liabilitywhere demonstrating that there is no causality is the only way to be exempted. Therefore, risk liabilitycan never be considered without insurance. This type of liability is usually regulated for specific typesof risks. So, there is always a typical risk defined for a particular operational activity which may causeunavoidable frequent or severe damage, regardless of how much due care is taken.In 2012, Turkish Code of Obligations has introduced a new general clause on risk liabilitywhich is applicable to all kinds of dangerous activities without defining the specific type of risk (art.71). According to this provision, liability could be established if it is demonstrated that an activity ofan enterprise causes an inevitable and significant danger. The said provision is stipulated as follows:“When damage occurs from the activity of an enterprise presenting a significantrisk, the owner of such enterprise and, if any, the operator are severally liable for suchdamage.Considering the nature of the enterprise or materials, tools or powers used in theactivity, if one concludes that an enterprise is likely to cause frequent or severe damageeven if all due care expected from a specialist in such activities is exercised, suchenterprise is deemed to present a significant risk. Particularly, if a special risk liabilityis envisaged in any other law for enterprises presenting the similar risks, such anenterprise is also considered to present a significant risk.Special provisions governing liability for a specific risk are reserved.Even if such activity of an enterprise presenting a significant risk is permitted bythe legal order, those who are injured may claim to balance out the damage caused bythe activity of such enterprise at an appropriate price.”This clause was originally inspired from the article 50 of the Swiss Draft Project for theReform and Unification of Tort Law (Widmer-Wessner Draft Project) but ended up as the“Frankenstein’s monster” as it has not considered this Draft Project in its entirety. At the end, thisprovision has widened the liability of owners and operators of enterprises which presents a significantrisk. But to what extend?The highly debated answer to this question is of utmost importance to set the boundaries ofinsurance. In order to answer this question, one must firstly evaluate the criteria used for assessingthe risk and also the meaning of its vague final paragraph. Accordingly, this paper aims to understandthe rationale for this provision, to evaluate the legal debates regarding the conditions and scope ofliability under this provision and its implications on both tort law and insurance law. Furthermore,this paper intends to discuss the possible role of a general risk clause in our times of climate crisis.So, in a nutshell, the ultimate question of this paper is whether this provision is the “Frankenstein’smonster” or a gateway for climate liability?
