Palanduz, Seda

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/2835
Name Variants
Palanduz, S.
Job Title
Email Address
palanduzs@mef.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
05. Faculty of Law
Status
Current Staff
Website
ORCID ID
0000-0002-9890-2904
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID
Files
1700608101-academic-1400000112.avif (22.21 KB)

Sustainable Development Goals

2

ZERO HUNGER
ZERO HUNGER Logo

0

Research Products

16

PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS Logo

1

Research Products

1

NO POVERTY
NO POVERTY Logo

0

Research Products

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

0

Research Products

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

0

Research Products

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

0

Research Products

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

0

Research Products

6

CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION Logo

0

Research Products

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

0

Research Products

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

0

Research Products

5

GENDER EQUALITY
GENDER EQUALITY Logo

0

Research Products

14

LIFE BELOW WATER
LIFE BELOW WATER Logo

0

Research Products

13

CLIMATE ACTION
CLIMATE ACTION Logo

0

Research Products

15

LIFE ON LAND
LIFE ON LAND Logo

0

Research Products

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

0

Research Products

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo

0

Research Products

4

QUALITY EDUCATION
QUALITY EDUCATION Logo

0

Research Products
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

6

Articles

0

Views / Downloads

1895/7627

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

0

Scopus Citation Count

0

WoS h-index

0

Scopus h-index

0

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

0.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

0.00

Open Access Source

2

Supervised Theses

0

JournalCount
13th Annual McGill Graduate Law Conference1
68th International Congress of SIHDA1
American Society of Comparative Law, Younger Comparativists Committee, 6th International Conference, 20171
Tüzel Kişilik Penceresinden Anonim Ortaklık Sempozyumu1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Quartile distribution chart data is not available

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

2019 - 201932020 - 20233
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book
    Halka açık anonim ortaklıklarda ortaklıktan çıkarma hakkı
    (On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2019) Palanduz, Seda
    Halka açık anonim ortaklıklarda ortaklıktan çıkarma hakkı, Türk Hukuku’na 6362 sayılı Sermaye Piyasası Kanunu m. 27 ile girmiştir. Çıkarma hakkı, halka açık anonim ortaklıklarda belirli bir hâkimiyet eşiğine erişen pay sahiplerine, başkaca bir sebebe gerek olmaksızın kalan pay sahiplerini şirketten uzaklaştırma imkânı vermektedir. Yabancı hukuklarda squeeze-out olarak ifade edilen Angloamerikan Hukuku kökenli bir müessesenin Türk Hukuku’ndaki karşılığı olan çıkarma hakkının önemi, hem hukuki hem de iktisadi işlevlerinden kaynaklanmaktadır. Çıkarma hakkının doğumu koşullarına ve kullanılması usulüne ilişkin esaslar II-27.2 sayılı Ortaklıktan Çıkarma ve Satma Hakları Tebliği’nde düzenlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada Tebliğ hükümleri, hakkın öngörülme amaçları göz önünde bulundurularak karşılaştırmalı hukuk, doktrin ve uygulama ışığında ele alınmıştır.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book
    Tüzel Kişilik Penceresinden Anonim Ortaklık Sempozyumu Mef Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi 20-22 Temmuz 2020
    (On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2020) Karagöz, Havva; Palanduz, Seda; Özcanlı, Beril; Karagöz, Havva; Palanduz, Seda; Özcanlı, Beril
    Bu kitap, MEF Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi tarafından 20-22 Temmuz 2020 tarihlerinde düzenlenen Tüzel Kişilik Penceresinden Anonim Ortaklık Sempozyumu'nda sunulan bildirilerden ve oturum sonlarında gerçekleştirilen soru-cevap bölümlerindeki tartışmalardan oluşmaktadır. Sempozyum, anonim ortaklıklar hukukuna hakim temel ilkelerin, günümüzde anonim ortaklık yapısının vardığı nokta ile bağlantısının sorgulanması ekseni etrafında şekillenmiştir. Kitapta yer alan bildiriler, anonim ortaklıklar hukukunun köklü konularına olduğu kadar teknolojik gelişmeler ışığında yakın zamanda gündeme gelen sorunlarına da değinmekte ve bu sorunların hem teorik hem de pratik yönlerini ele almaktadır. Bu bağlamda kitap, karşılaştırmalı hukuktaki güncel tartışma ve eğilimlere ve özellikle de Türk anonim ortaklıklar hukukunun bu gelişmeler karşısındaki konumuna ışık tutmakta ve yeni tartışmaların kapılarını aralamaktadır.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    The evolving concept of affectio societatis
    (2019) Palanduz, Seda
    Under Roman Law, societas (partnership) was a consensual contract by which two or more parties agree to join their goods or services to carry out a common activity and to share the resulting profits and losses. For the constitution of a partnership, all partners should have the will to contribute to the common activity in question. This will, referred to as affectio societatis, is the intentional element in the definition of a partnership. It not only characterizes a partnership but also distinguishes it from other types of contract, especially from employment contract and contract for work and services. It is beyond question that modern corporate law is more complex than the Roman Law of partnerships. So although the concept of affectio societatis mostly persists, its scope and function are highly disputed. The question is to reconcile the classical definition of affectio societatis with the concept of partnership in today’s limited liability companies with a single shareholder or in publicly traded companies with a large number of shareholders.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Business Ethics and Corporate Governance for the Sharing Economy
    (2019) Palanduz, Seda
    Sharing economy is a business model that allows individuals to share goods, offer services, and access these through specifically designed online platforms. Sharing economy businesses operate in a variety of different fields, with the most popular examples being ride-sharing and house-rental companies such as Airbnb, Uber, and Lyft. Mixing the personal with the professional, sharing economy businesses strive and usually manage to escape the regulatory grip on comparable non-sharing economy businesses that provide similar goods and services. Courts, regulators, competing businesses, and participants frequently raise concerns regarding public safety, privacy, and unfair competition. Regulators have the difficult job of balancing two concerns: On the one hand, excessive regulation might hinder innovation and deprive many people of a service that they obviously find helpful. On the other hand, insufficient regulation might create safety risks or insulate firms from liability. This paper approaches the sharing economy from the perspective of business ethics and corporate governance. It seeks to do two things: First, establish that a stakeholder oriented approach, rather than pure shareholder primacy, should guide self-governance by sharing economy businesses; and second, explain that this principle should be institutionalized through procedural corporate governance mechanisms. The second assertion is supported by a comparative analysis of different models of stakeholder engagement.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book Part
    Haksız rekabet ve rekabet hukuku arasındaki ilişki ve sorumluluk sebeplerinin yarışması
    (On İki Levha, 2023) Palanduz, Seda
    Sağlıklı bir rekabet ortamı, Türkiye’nin de dâhil olduğu piyasa ekonomilerinin temel taşıdır. Piyasa ekonomisi, ekonominin merkezi bir karar biriminin talimatları olmaksızın piyasa dinamiklerine dayalı olarak şekillendiği düzeni ifade eder: Ekonomik birimlerin koordinasyonu, arz ve talep miktarının belirlenmesi, mal ve hizmetlerin fiyatlarının oluşumu, esas olarak piyasa tarafından gerçekleştirilir .Piyasa ekonomisinin gerektirdiği rekabet koşulları, her zaman piyasa dinamikleri neticesinde kendiliğinden oluşmayabilir. Bu durumda etkin bir rekabet ortamının sağlanması amacıyla piyasaya müdahalede bulunulması meşru ve tercih edilir hâle gelir . Rekabet hukukunun temelinde de bu gerekçe yatmaktadır. Geniş anlamda rekabet hukuku, bu amaçla yapılan tüm düzenlemeleri kapsamına alır . Bunların başında, çalışmamızın konusunu teşkil eden 4054 sayılı Rekabetin Korunması Hakkında Kanun (RKHK) ve 6102 sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu (TTK) m. 54 ve devamında yer alan haksız rekabet düzenlemeleri gelmektedir . Rekabet hukuku ve haksız rekabet iki farklı müessese olarak farklı kanunlarda düzenlenmektedir; ancak ne TTK ne de RKHK, birbirleri arasındaki ilişkiye dair bir hüküm içerir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, öncelikle her birinin amaç ve uygulama alanları ekseninde bu iki alan arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymak; ikinci olarak da bundan hareketle haksız rekabet ve rekabet hukuku düzenlemelerinin aynı anda ihlali hâlinde sorumluluk sebebinin yarışmasını ve bunun yaptırımlara etkisini incelemektir.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Are Happy Families All Alike? - a Turkish Perspective on Corporate Governance in Family Firms
    (2020) Palanduz, Seda
    Corporate law aims to mitigate conflicts of interest among corporate constituencies. Both legal scholars and lawmakers tend to assume that these are rational actors solely motivated by wealth maximization. Family firms, however, add more personal and less rational layers to the inquiry: On the one hand, family ties may enable a relationship of trust that reduces transaction and agency costs; on the other hand, the same intimacy and sentimentality may eventually create conflicts of interest among family members, make the firm vulnerable to changes in the family dynamic, or cause tensions between family and non-family shareholders. Successful family businesses have to integrate family and business governance—a job that, in many jurisdictions, is being unnecessarily complicated due to absence of proper corporate governance regimes supporting family businesses. From a Turkish perspective, this paper aims to discuss ways through which lawmakers may adopt family firm-friendly corporate governance regimes. The choice of jurisdiction is not incidental. In Turkey, where family firms play a crucial role in the national economy, there are no codes of governance or soft law measures specific to them. On the contrary, Turkish Commercial Code includes the principle of statute stringency that prohibits all deviations from legal provisions unless expressly permitted. Turkey serves as a good example to demonstrate the consequences of overlooking particularities of family firms. This paper has two central claims: First, it seeks to establish that lawmakers should prioritize default rules over mandatory ones so that family firms can tailor their articles of association to their unique circumstances through legal devices such as exit rights and share transfer restrictions. Second, it argues that in case of reluctance to negotiate legally binding instruments due to fear of impairing ties of trust and intimacy, non-binding family constitutions should be encouraged as an alternative.