Samancı, Buket

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/2724
Name Variants
Samancı, Buket
Buket Samancı
Samancı, B.
Job Title
Email Address
samancib@mef.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
03.01. Department of Architecture
Status
Current Staff
Website
ORCID ID
0009-0006-6802-5222
Scopus Author ID
Scopus indeksli yayını olmadığından ID yok
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID
Web of Science indeksli yayını olmadığından ID yok
Files
Buket Samancı.webp (4.69 KB)

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available
Scopus data could not be loaded because of an error. Please refresh the page or try again later.
Documents

0

Citations

0

Go to WoS profile
Scholarly Output

2

Articles

1

Views / Downloads

196/1483

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

0

Scopus Citation Count

0

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

0.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

0.00

Open Access Source

2

Supervised Theses

0

JournalCount
Ege Mimarlık1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Quartile distribution chart data is not available

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

20232
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Deprem Sonrası Hatay İçin Tasarla ve Yap
    (Ege Mimarlık, 2023) Avcı, Ozan; İnceoğlu, Arda; Çelik, Ceren; Özdemir, Kürşad; Sağlam, Didem; Samancı, Buket; Sert, Esra; Ünver, Büşra; Yıldız, Zülfüye
  • Thumbnail Image
    journal-article.listelement.badge
    Mock‐up versus CAD Modeling Preferences of Architecture Students in the Early Design Phase
    (JCoDe: Journal of Computational Design, 2023) Samancı, Buket; Taşpınar, Özge; Karcı, Yaşar Emir; Cengiz, Başak; Özdoğan, Selen; Yıldız Özkan, Dilek; Bittermann, Michael S
    Preferences for using physical mock-up modeling or computer-aided design (CAD) among architecture students in the early design phase are analyzed. The data is obtained from a questionnaire, consisting of eight multiple-choice questions and one open-ended question. The respondents are architecture students; the majority of them are still in their undergraduate studies. As quantitative analysis methods hypothesis tests based on the probability distributions known as the z-distribution, and the Chi-squared distribution were carried out. Generally, it was investigated which modeling technique is more efficient in the early design phase. Moreover, according to the age groups of respondents, the difference in the preference among mock-up and CAD is identified. Explicitly, younger students prefer CAD, while other ones prefer mock-up representation. The reasons for the difference are analyzed. Since the choice for mock-up modeling or CAD modeling can have a strong impact on the design processes of both, students and professionals, the result of the study is relevant, because it gives a hint about probable future architecture practice.