Impact of Introducing Semi-Rigid Moment Frames on Seismic Response of Braced Frames
| dc.contributor.author | Shen, Jay | |
| dc.contributor.author | Akbaş, Bülent | |
| dc.contributor.author | Şeker, Onur | |
| dc.contributor.author | Faytarouni, Mahmoud | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-21T14:16:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-05-21T14:16:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Maximum seismic inelastic drift demand in a steel building with braced frames as primary seismic-force-resisting (SFR) system tends to concentrate in few stories without considering inherent participation of designed gravity-force-resisting (GFR) system in actual structural stiffness and strength. The influence of GFR system on stiffness and strength can be taken into account by considering the composite action in beam-to-column shear connections that exist in modern steel building construction to form actual semi-rigid moment-resisting frames. Therefore, modeling semi-rigid moment frames as an equivalent to the GFR system in braced frame buildings could be utilized as a representative to the strength provided by gravity frames. This paper presents a seismic evaluation of a six-story chevron braced frame, with and without semi-rigid moment frame. Four different cases are investigated under a set of ground motions and results are discussed in terms of story drift distribution along the height. The results pointed out that the current findings lay a foundation to conduct further investigation on the seismic performance of braced frames as designed SFR system together with GFR system. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Faytarouni, M., Seker, O., Akbas, B., & Shen, J. (May 20, 2019). Impact of introducing semi-rigid moment frames on seismic response of braced frames. Interdependence between Structural Engineering and Construction Management. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.14455/isec.res.2019.88 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2644-108X | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85087229011 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.res.2019.88 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1086 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | 2019 ISEC Press | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Interdependence between Structural Engineering and Construction Management | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Pushover analysis | |
| dc.subject | Seismic drift demand | |
| dc.subject | Non-linear time history analysis | |
| dc.subject | Braced frame | |
| dc.subject | Semi-rigid moment frame | |
| dc.title | Impact of Introducing Semi-Rigid Moment Frames on Seismic Response of Braced Frames | |
| dc.type | Conference Object | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Şeker, Onur | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C5 | |
| gdc.coar.access | open access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::conference output | |
| gdc.description.department | Mühendislik Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü | |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q4 | |
| gdc.description.volume | 6 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W2950293257 | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.oaire.accesstype | GOLD | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 0.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 2.5942106E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | true | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Non-linear time history analysis | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Braced frame | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Semi-rigid moment frame | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Seismic drift demand | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Pushover analysis | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Braced frame, Semi-rigid moment frame, Pushover analysis, Non-linear time history analysis, Seismic drift demand | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 1.4391428E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | International | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 0.0 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.06 | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 0 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 7 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 0 | |
| gdc.publishedmonth | Mayıs | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 0 | |
| gdc.wos.publishedmonth | Mayıs | |
| gdc.yokperiod | YÖK - 2018-19 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | a6e60d5c-b0c7-474a-b49b-284dc710c078 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | a6e60d5c-b0c7-474a-b49b-284dc710c078 |
