Favoring Inequalities and Mind-Reading: Social Dominance Orientation Relates To Poor Mentalizing
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2023
Authors
Selçuk, Bilge
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sage Publications Inc
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Although studies have so far investigated social dominance orientation (SDO) in relation to its association with prejudice and discrimination toward outgroups, it is not known whether SDO's link with poor intergroup relations might be underlined by specific socio-cognitive factors such as reduced mind-reading motivation (MRM) and poor mind-reading performance. The present study tested whether endorsement of SDO is associated with decreased MRM and mind-reading accuracy toward both ingroup and outgroup targets. We randomly assigned one hundred and 20 Turkish university students (M- age = 22.02) into two target groups for mind-reading, Turkish ingroup (N = 60) and Syrian outgroup (N = 60), and asked them to infer minds of either ingroup or outgroup members depending on their target group. Participants also reported their level of MRM and SDO through questionnaires. When the target was a Turkish ingroup member, SDO negatively and directly predicted mind-reading, when the target was an outgroup member, however, higher SDO indirectly predicted lower mind-reading through reduced MRM. These results pointed that favoring intergroup hierarchies relates to poor understanding of others' mental states although the mechanism of the relation changes depending on the group membership of the target.
Description
Keywords
Racism, Social dominance orientation, Wing authoritarianism, Mind-reading motivation, Impact, Mind-reading, Prejudice, Readingmind, Reading motivation, Prejudice, Social dominance orientationmind
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
Ekerim-Akbulut, M., & Selcuk, B. (2023). Favoring Inequalities and Mind-Reading: Social Dominance Orientation Relates to Poor Mentalizing. Psychological Reports, 00332941231173877.
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
2
Source
Psychological Reports
Volume
128
Issue
Start Page
2518
End Page
2529
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 4
PubMed : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 7
SCOPUS™ Citations
4
checked on Feb 04, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
5
checked on Feb 04, 2026
Page Views
259
checked on Feb 04, 2026
Downloads
24
checked on Feb 04, 2026
Google Scholar™


