Exploring Individual Differences in Infants' Looking Preferences for Impossible Events: the Early Multidimensional Curiosity Scale
Loading...
Date
2023
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Frontiers Media Sa
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Infants are drawn to events that violate their expectations about the world: they look longer at physically impossible events, such as when a car passes through a wall. Here, we examined whether individual differences in infants' visual preferences for physically impossible events reflect an early form of curiosity, and asked whether caregivers' behaviors, parenting styles, and everyday routines relate to these differences. In Study 1, we presented infants (N = 47, M-age = 16.83 months, range = 10.29-24.59 months) with events that violated physical principles and closely matched possible events. We measured infants' everyday curiosity and related experiences (i.e., caregiver curiosity-promoting activities) through a newly developed curiosity scale, The Early Multidimensional Curiosity Scale (EMCS). Infants' looking preferences for physically impossible events were positively associated with their score on the EMCS, but not their temperament, vocabulary, or caregiver trait curiosity. In Study 2A, we set out to better understand the relation between the EMCS and infants' looking preferences for physically impossible events by assessing the underlying structure of the EMCS with a larger sample of children (N = 211, M-age = 47.63 months, range = 10.29-78.97 months). An exploratory factor analysis revealed that children's curiosity was comprised four factors: Social Curiosity, Broad Exploration, Persistence, and Information-Seeking. Relatedly, caregiver curiosity-promoting activities were composed of five factors: Flexible Problem-Solving, Cognitive Stimulation, Diverse Daily Activities, Child-Directed Play, and Awe-Inducing Activities. In Study 2B (N = 42 infants from Study 1), we examined which aspects of infant curiosity and caregiver behavior predicted infants' looking preferences using the factor structures of the EMCS. Findings revealed that infants' looking preferences were uniquely related to infants' Broad Exploration and caregivers' Awe-Inducing Activities (e.g., nature walks with infants, museum outings). These exploratory findings indicate that infants' visual preferences for physically impossible events may reflect an early form of curiosity, which is related to the curiosity-stimulating environments provided by caregivers. Moreover, this work offers a new comprehensive tool, the Early Multidimensional Curiosity Scale, that can be used to measure both curiosity and factors related to its development, starting in infancy and extending into childhood.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Knowledge, Epistemic curiosity, Fit indexes, Temperament, Scale development, Awe, Individual differences, Effortful control, Curiosity, Achievement, Young-children, Expectations, Exploration, Childrens questions, Cognitive development, Parenting, Number, curiosity, awe, Epistemic Curiosity, Number, scale development, Childrens Questions, Expectations, Effortful Control, Achievement, exploration, BF1-990, Knowledge, parenting, Young-Children, Psychology, Fit Indexes, Temperament, individual differences, cognitive development
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
Lee, N., Lazaro, V., Wang, J. J., Şen, H. H., & Lucca, K. (2023). Exploring individual differences in infants’ looking preferences for impossible events: The Early Multidimensional Curiosity Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1015649.
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
5
Source
Frontiers in Psychology
Volume
13
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 6
PubMed : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 37
SCOPUS™ Citations
6
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
4
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Page Views
257
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Downloads
435
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™


