Better Basin Management With Stakeholder Participation
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Authors
Kibaroğlu, Ayşegül
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press
Open Access Color
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Abstract
This interdisciplinary volume examines how nine arid or semi-arid river basins with thriving irrigated agriculture are doing now and how they may change between now and mid-century. The rivers studied are the Colorado, Euphrates-Tigris, Jucar, Limarí, Murray-Darling, Nile, Rio Grande, São Francisco, and Yellow. Engineered dams and distribution networks brought large benefits to farmers and cities, but now the water systems face multiple challenges, above all climate change, reservoir siltation, and decreased water flows. Unchecked, they will see reduced food production and endanger the economic livelihood of basin populations.
This chapter reviews the role of irrigation districts, city water utilities, and environmental groups in basin management. Examples from two river basins – Rio Grande and Euphrates–Tigris – illustrate vast differences in stakeholder participation. The authors recommend that all SERIDAS rivers pay increased attention to this option for better management. The four options for creating sub-basin water councils recommended for the Rio Grande provide useful guidance. Other models, reflecting different basin conditions, may emerge. Whatever model is selected, stakeholders should always organize to address the water agenda of their sub-basin. Doing so directly contributes to reaching and maintaining sustainability of the river as a whole. © Jurgen Schmandt, Aysegul Kibaroglu, Regina M. Buono and Sephra Thomas 2021.
This chapter reviews the role of irrigation districts, city water utilities, and environmental groups in basin management. Examples from two river basins – Rio Grande and Euphrates–Tigris – illustrate vast differences in stakeholder participation. The authors recommend that all SERIDAS rivers pay increased attention to this option for better management. The four options for creating sub-basin water councils recommended for the Rio Grande provide useful guidance. Other models, reflecting different basin conditions, may emerge. Whatever model is selected, stakeholders should always organize to address the water agenda of their sub-basin. Doing so directly contributes to reaching and maintaining sustainability of the river as a whole. © Jurgen Schmandt, Aysegul Kibaroglu, Regina M. Buono and Sephra Thomas 2021.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
City Water Utilities, Etic, Euphrates, Irrigation Districts, Participation, Rio Grande, Stakeholders, Sub-Basin Governance, Sustainability, Tigris, Water-Supply – Management, Arid Regions, Sustainable Development, Water Resources Development, Watershed Management, Irrigation
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
Schmandt, J., & Kibaroglu, A., (August 2021). Batter basin management with stakeholder participation in Schmandt, J. Kibaroglu, A., & Thomas, S. (eds.) Sustainability of Engineered Rivers In Arid Lands Challenge and Response, Cambridge University Press. p. 262-271.
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
N/A
Source
Volume
Issue
Start Page
262-271
262
262
End Page
271
Google Scholar™
Sustainable Development Goals
6
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION

10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES

11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
