Using Screencasting To Give Feedback for Academic Writing

dc.contributor.author Bush, Jerome
dc.date.accessioned 2020-11-21T08:32:54Z
dc.date.available 2020-11-21T08:32:54Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.description.abstract This article reports on student reactions to a relatively new method of giving feedback using a technique called ‘screencasting’. Screencasting is a technique where the computer screen is captured in a video while an audio recording is being made. In this way, students can receive oral feedback in conjunction with written corrective feedback. Forty-four freshman students from an advanced writing class in the ELT department of a small private university in Istanbul participated in the study. During the semester, three high stakes essay assignments were given. For the first essay only written corrective feedback was given, but for the subsequent two essays students received a combination of written and oral feedback through screencasting. Screencasting was originally used because it was purported to be more efficient than written corrective feedback. While it wasn’t found to be more efficient for the teacher, it was enthusiastically embraced by the students. To gauge the students’ perceptions, a survey was given at the same time as the final exam. The survey included a section for demographics, four open-ended questions, and 28 Likert scale-type questions. The Likert-type questions represented nine categories of inquiry including both practical and affective factors. The results indicated overwhelmingly that the students perceive screencast feedback as more pleasant and more effective than written corrective feedback alone. The technique is appropriate to the twenty-first century classroom and the learning styles of modern students. It is recommended that this technique be adopted in academic writing classes.
dc.identifier.citation Bush, J. C. (November 05, 2020). Using screencasting to give feedback for academic writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1840571
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/17501229.2020.1840571
dc.identifier.issn 1750-1229
dc.identifier.issn 1750-1237
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85095832807
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1840571
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1380
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Routledge
dc.relation.ispartof Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Screencasting
dc.subject Feedback
dc.subject University
dc.subject Writing
dc.subject Technology
dc.subject Corrective feedback
dc.subject Elt
dc.title Using Screencasting To Give Feedback for Academic Writing
dc.type Article
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Jerome Bush / 0000-0001-6897-9209
gdc.author.institutional Bush, Jerome
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department Eğitim Fakültesi, İngilizce Öğretmenliği Bölümü
gdc.description.endpage 14
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 1
gdc.description.volume 15
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W3096047690
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000590739900001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.accesstype HYBRID
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 7.0
gdc.oaire.influence 3.539646E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords ELT
gdc.oaire.keywords Technology
gdc.oaire.keywords University
gdc.oaire.keywords Corrective feedback
gdc.oaire.keywords Writing
gdc.oaire.keywords Screencasting
gdc.oaire.keywords Feedback
gdc.oaire.popularity 1.4873843E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 05 social sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0503 education
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 17.69214284
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.99
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 1%
gdc.opencitations.count 14
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 1
gdc.plumx.mendeley 84
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 19
gdc.publishedmonth Kasım
gdc.scopus.citedcount 19
gdc.wos.citedcount 16
gdc.wos.documenttype Article; Early Access
gdc.wos.indexdate 2020
gdc.wos.publishedmonth Kasım
gdc.yokperiod YÖK - 2020-21
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a6e60d5c-b0c7-474a-b49b-284dc710c078
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery a6e60d5c-b0c7-474a-b49b-284dc710c078

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Using screencasting to give feedback for academic writing.pdf
Size:
1.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full Text - Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: