Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1380
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bush, Jerome | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-21T08:32:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-21T08:32:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Bush, J. C. (November 05, 2020). Using screencasting to give feedback for academic writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1840571 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1750-1229 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1840571 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1380 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article reports on student reactions to a relatively new method of giving feedback using a technique called ‘screencasting’. Screencasting is a technique where the computer screen is captured in a video while an audio recording is being made. In this way, students can receive oral feedback in conjunction with written corrective feedback. Forty-four freshman students from an advanced writing class in the ELT department of a small private university in Istanbul participated in the study. During the semester, three high stakes essay assignments were given. For the first essay only written corrective feedback was given, but for the subsequent two essays students received a combination of written and oral feedback through screencasting. Screencasting was originally used because it was purported to be more efficient than written corrective feedback. While it wasn’t found to be more efficient for the teacher, it was enthusiastically embraced by the students. To gauge the students’ perceptions, a survey was given at the same time as the final exam. The survey included a section for demographics, four open-ended questions, and 28 Likert scale-type questions. The Likert-type questions represented nine categories of inquiry including both practical and affective factors. The results indicated overwhelmingly that the students perceive screencast feedback as more pleasant and more effective than written corrective feedback alone. The technique is appropriate to the twenty-first century classroom and the learning styles of modern students. It is recommended that this technique be adopted in academic writing classes. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Screencasting | en_US |
dc.subject | Feedback | en_US |
dc.subject | University | en_US |
dc.subject | Writing | en_US |
dc.subject | Technology | en_US |
dc.subject | Corrective feedback | en_US |
dc.subject | Elt | en_US |
dc.title | Using Screencasting To Give Feedback for Academic Writing | en_US |
dc.type | Book Part | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/17501229.2020.1840571 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85095832807 | en_US |
dc.authorid | Jerome Bush / 0000-0001-6897-9209 | - |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | - |
dc.description.WoSDocumentType | Article; Early Access | |
dc.description.WoSPublishedMonth | Kasım | en_US |
dc.description.WoSIndexDate | 2020 | en_US |
dc.description.WoSYOKperiod | YÖK - 2020-21 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 14 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1 | en_US |
dc.department | Eğitim Fakültesi, İngilizce Öğretmenliği Bölümü | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000590739900001 | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Bush, Jerome | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairetype | Book Part | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
Appears in Collections: | İngilizce Öğretmenliği Koleksiyonu Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Using screencasting to give feedback for academic writing.pdf | Full Text - Article | 1.23 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
12
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
11
checked on Nov 16, 2024
Page view(s)
32
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Download(s)
42
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.