Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1380
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBush, Jerome-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-21T08:32:54Z
dc.date.available2020-11-21T08:32:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationBush, J. C. (November 05, 2020). Using screencasting to give feedback for academic writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1840571en_US
dc.identifier.issn1750-1229-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1840571-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1380-
dc.description.abstractThis article reports on student reactions to a relatively new method of giving feedback using a technique called ‘screencasting’. Screencasting is a technique where the computer screen is captured in a video while an audio recording is being made. In this way, students can receive oral feedback in conjunction with written corrective feedback. Forty-four freshman students from an advanced writing class in the ELT department of a small private university in Istanbul participated in the study. During the semester, three high stakes essay assignments were given. For the first essay only written corrective feedback was given, but for the subsequent two essays students received a combination of written and oral feedback through screencasting. Screencasting was originally used because it was purported to be more efficient than written corrective feedback. While it wasn’t found to be more efficient for the teacher, it was enthusiastically embraced by the students. To gauge the students’ perceptions, a survey was given at the same time as the final exam. The survey included a section for demographics, four open-ended questions, and 28 Likert scale-type questions. The Likert-type questions represented nine categories of inquiry including both practical and affective factors. The results indicated overwhelmingly that the students perceive screencast feedback as more pleasant and more effective than written corrective feedback alone. The technique is appropriate to the twenty-first century classroom and the learning styles of modern students. It is recommended that this technique be adopted in academic writing classes.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInnovation in Language Learning and Teachingen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectScreencastingen_US
dc.subjectFeedbacken_US
dc.subjectUniversityen_US
dc.subjectWritingen_US
dc.subjectTechnologyen_US
dc.subjectCorrective feedbacken_US
dc.subjectElten_US
dc.titleUsing Screencasting To Give Feedback for Academic Writingen_US
dc.typeBook Parten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17501229.2020.1840571-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85095832807en_US
dc.authoridJerome Bush / 0000-0001-6897-9209-
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1-
dc.description.WoSDocumentTypeArticle; Early Access
dc.description.WoSPublishedMonthKasımen_US
dc.description.WoSIndexDate2020en_US
dc.description.WoSYOKperiodYÖK - 2020-21en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.endpage14en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.departmentEğitim Fakültesi, İngilizce Öğretmenliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000590739900001en_US
dc.institutionauthorBush, Jerome-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeBook Part-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:İngilizce Öğretmenliği Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Using screencasting to give feedback for academic writing.pdfFull Text - Article1.23 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Nov 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Page view(s)

32
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Download(s)

42
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.