Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/2272
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFong, Carlton J.-
dc.contributor.authorSchallert, Diane L.-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Shengjie-
dc.contributor.authorAltan, Servet-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T12:19:51Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-21T12:19:51Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn0191-491X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101351-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/2272-
dc.description.abstractBeliefs about the future, instantiated as a learner's future time perspective, have been largely overlooked in the research on the connection between feedback and motivation. Because feedback statements vary in their level of specificity and friendliness (a commonly reported distinction between peer-provided and instructor-provided feedback), we were interested in the interplay between such feedback characteristics and learners' future time perspective. With 392 U.S. undergraduates, we investigated how future time perspective (specifically, its valence and connectedness) affected whether learners perceived as constructive feedback statements that varied in specificity and friendliness, and whether gender and academic discipline would influence these perceptions. Future time perspective connectedness was positively associated with perceptions of feedback constructiveness for specific statements but was negatively related to constructiveness for unspecific statements. Valence was positively correlated with feedback constructiveness for unspecific statements. Although no differences in academic discipline were found, gender effects emerged. Implications for peer feedback are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectConstructive feedbacken_US
dc.subjectFuture time perspectiveen_US
dc.subjectCollegeen_US
dc.subjectGenderen_US
dc.subjectAcademic majoren_US
dc.subjectPeer feedbacken_US
dc.titleHow constructive is that feedback? Associations with undergraduates' future time perspectives moderated by student characteristics'en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101351-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85188466547en_US
dc.authorscopusid55873149300-
dc.authorscopusid6602072194-
dc.authorscopusid57189517698-
dc.authorscopusid57200795650-
dc.description.woscitationindexSocial Science Citation Index-
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.volume81en_US
dc.departmentMef Universityen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001214373000001en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount0-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.