Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/2290
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAvcı, Ozan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T12:19:52Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-21T12:19:52Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationAVCI, O., 2024. “Architectural Representation as a Body Without Organs” in “Beauty and Monstrosity in Art and Culture” edited by: Chara Kokkiou and Angeliki Malakasioti, Routledge, New York, p. 179-186. ISBN: 978-1-032-35582-5 (hbk), ISBN: 978-1-032-35584-9 (pbk), ISBN: 978-1-003-32751-6 (ebk), DOI: 10.4324/9781003327516en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781032355825-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/2290-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003327516-24-
dc.description.abstractArchitectural representation plays a critical role as a creative tool, facilitating dialogue and mediation between designer and design. While traditionally viewed as an objective entity, it holds potential for creative expression. Architectural representation is traditionally associated with objectivity and aesthetic beauty. However, as a design tool, it should also embrace subjectivity. Subjectivity in architectural representation goes beyond the architect’s style or drawings, encompassing the presence of the subject within the representation. At this stage, architectural representation becomes related to bodily experience and every experience has its own deformations. The presence of bodily deformations in architectural representations transforms its rigid body into a body without organs. This “new” body may be defined as “beast” rather than “beauty.” In this chapter, I would like to discuss architectural representation as a body without organs to highlight its emancipatory and participatory characteristics that may trigger creativity within the context of analogue and digital worlds. I would also like to emphasize the relationship between beauty and monstrosity that a bodily deformed architectural representation may create and start a new discussion on the aesthetics of architectural representation. © 2024 selection and editorial matter, Chara Kokkiou and Angeliki Malakasioti; individual chapters, the contributors.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBeauty and Monstrosity in Art and Cultureen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[no keyword available]en_US
dc.titleArchitectural Representation as a Body Without Organsen_US
dc.typeBook Parten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003327516-24-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85191917220-
dc.authorscopusid56740852100-
dc.description.PublishedMonthNisanen_US
dc.description.woscitationindexBook Citation Index- Social Sciences and Humanitiesen_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararasıen_US
dc.identifier.endpage186en_US
dc.identifier.startpage179en_US
dc.departmentSanat Tasarım ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mimarlık Bölümüen_US
dc.institutionauthorAvcı, Ozan-
dc.identifier.citationcount0-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeBook Part-
crisitem.author.dept03.01. Department of Architecture-
Appears in Collections:Mimarlık Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Beauty and Monstrosity in Art and Culture.pdf8.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.

Page view(s)

132
checked on Apr 21, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.