Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/2457
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKahraman, Fatma-
dc.contributor.authorAktas, Aysenur-
dc.contributor.authorBayrakceken, Serra-
dc.contributor.authorÇakar, Tuna-
dc.contributor.authorTarcan, Hande Serim-
dc.contributor.authorBayram, Bugrahan-
dc.contributor.authorUlman, Yesim Isil-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-05T18:25:03Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-05T18:25:03Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn2296-2565-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1428396-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/2457-
dc.description.abstractBackground/aim Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the capability of computational systems to perform tasks that require human-like cognitive functions, such as reasoning, learning, and decision-making. Unlike human intelligence, AI does not involve sentience or consciousness but focuses on data processing, pattern recognition, and prediction through algorithms and learned experiences. In healthcare including neuroscience, AI is valuable for improving prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and surveillance.Methods This qualitative study aimed to investigate the acceptability of AI in Medicine (AIIM) and to elucidate any technical and scientific, as well as social and ethical issues involved. Twenty-five doctors from various specialties were carefully interviewed regarding their views, experience, knowledge, and attitude toward AI in healthcare.Results Content analysis confirmed the key ethical principles involved: confidentiality, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Honesty was the least invoked principle. A thematic analysis established four salient topic areas, i.e., advantages, risks, restrictions, and precautions. Alongside the advantages, there were many limitations and risks. The study revealed a perceived need for precautions to be embedded in healthcare policies to counter the risks discussed. These precautions need to be multi-dimensional.Conclusion The authors conclude that AI should be rationally guided, function transparently, and produce impartial results. It should assist human healthcare professionals collaboratively. This kind of AI will permit fairer, more innovative healthcare which benefits patients and society whilst preserving human dignity. It can foster accuracy and precision in medical practice and reduce the workload by assisting physicians during clinical tasks. AIIM that functions transparently and respects the public interest can be an inspiring scientific innovation for humanity.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity Research Fund (ABAPKO) [2019/03/06]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by University Research Fund (ABAPKO) under Grant 2019/03/06.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media Saen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectHealthcareen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectDecision-Makingen_US
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen_US
dc.titlePhysicians' Ethical Concerns About Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: a Qualitative Study: "the Final Decision Should Rest With a Human"en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpubh.2024.1428396-
dc.identifier.pmid39664534-
dc.authoridTuna Çakar / 0000-0001-8594-7399-
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded - Social Science Citation Index-
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.departmentMef Universityen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001373838600001-
dc.institutionauthorÇakar, Tuna-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.dept02.02. Department of Computer Engineering-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

4
checked on Jan 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.