Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/303
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Eke, Aylin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Booth, Robert W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Peker, Müjde | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-16T16:33:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-16T16:33:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Peker, M., Booth, R. W., & Eke, A. (April 26, 2018). Relationships among self-construal, gender, social dominance orientation, and interpersonal distance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48, 9, 494-505. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-9029 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | (e) 1559-1816 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12529 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/303 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The present research focuses on the cognitive embodiment of physical proximity, through interpersonal distance’s relationship with self‐construal, gender, and social dominance orientation. Previous work showed that more independent self‐construal was associated with higher distancing preferences of participants, and that females tend to have higher interdependent self‐construal that lead them to prefer less interpersonal distance. We expected to replicate these findings. However, due to the relationship between power and interpersonal distance, it was argued that gender and perceptions regarding the social hierarchy would also play a role in predicting interpersonal distance. More specifically, it was predicted that while females who accept social hierarchies between males and females would prefer more distance when interacting with males, males would not differ in their preference for social distance.One hundred participants (67 female) completed the Comfortable Interpersonal Distance Scale, Independent and Interdependent Self‐Construal Scales and the Social Dominance Orientation Scale. Interdependent self‐construal was negatively correlated with overall preferred interpersonal distance. Moreover, females high on social dominance orientation preferred larger interpersonal distance from male adult strangers than from female adult strangers. The findings provide further support for the embodiment of self‐construal by showing that psychological closeness and heteronomy are related to physical closeness. The findings also highlight the importance of investigating communal sharing and authority ranking dimensions simultaneously when focusing on interpersonal distance as well as differentiating females’ interpersonal sensitivity due to low power with their high affiliation. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | - | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Applied Social Psychology | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Self-construal | en_US |
dc.subject | Gender | en_US |
dc.subject | Interpersonal distance | en_US |
dc.subject | Social dominance orientation | en_US |
dc.title | Relationships Among Self-Construal, Gender, Social Dominance Orientation, and Interpersonal Distance | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jasp.12529 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85052393016 | en_US |
dc.authorid | Müjde Peker / 31292 | - |
dc.authorid | Müjde Peker / 0000-0003-4608-5217 | - |
dc.description.woscitationindex | Social Science Citation Index | - |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | - |
dc.description.WoSDocumentType | Article | |
dc.description.WoSInternationalCollaboration | Uluslararası işbirliği ile yapılmayan - HAYIR | en_US |
dc.description.WoSPublishedMonth | Eylül | en_US |
dc.description.WoSIndexDate | 2018 | en_US |
dc.description.WoSYOKperiod | YÖK - 2018-19 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 505 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 494 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 48 | en_US |
dc.department | İİSBF, Psikoloji Bölümü | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000444801400003 | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Booth, Robert William | - |
dc.institutionauthor | Peker, Müjde | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | embargo_20890216 | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 04.02. Department of Psychology | - |
Appears in Collections: | Psikoloji Bölümü Koleksiyonu Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Peker, Booth & Eke '18- Interpersonal Distance (JASP).pdf Until 2089-02-16 | Yayıncı Sürümü | 703.34 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
8
checked on Nov 23, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
6
checked on Nov 23, 2024
Page view(s)
28
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.