05. Fakülteler

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/7

Browse

Browsing 05. Fakülteler by Author "Abacıoğlu, Seda"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Bibliometric Analysis of the MCDM Methods in the Last Decade: WASPAS, MABAC, EDAS, CODAS, COCOSO, and MARCOS
    (International Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 2022) Ayan, Büşra; Abacıoğlu, Seda
    In recent years, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques have expanded the corpus of existing techniques and demonstrated their effectiveness with applications in various fields. In this study, bibliometric analysis was conducted to evaluate the research trend on new ranking-based MCDM methods in the last decade, namely WASPAS, MABAC, EDAS, CODAS, COCOSO, and MARCOS. The various keyword combinations are searched on the Web of Science and the Scopus databases. Bibliometric analysis is carried out in R with the Biblioshiny app for the bibliometrix package. In total, 1,215 related publications are analyzed. The sources, authors, countries, and publications are examined in terms of production and total citation, and the most frequent keywords with trend topics are obtained. The summaries of the findings are as follows: The number of publications has increased over the years for all the methods. The most cited studies belong to the authors of the methods and fuzzy implementations related to the methods. For the author's impact and productivity, Zavadskas and Pamučar stand out. Turkey and India rank in the top five in terms of the number of publications produced on all methods. China is the most cited country for the three methods. According to keyword analysis, different research topics such as sustainability, renewable energy, optimization, supplier selection, hydrogen production and transport are investigated through these methods and other techniques are utilized, such as SWARA, AHP, TOPSIS, Best-Worst, DEMATEL, MAIRCA, and CRITIC.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Review
    Citation - WoS: 136
    Citation - Scopus: 165
    A Comprehensive Review of the Novel Weighting Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    (MDPI, 2023) Abacıoğlu, Seda; Ayan, Büşra; Basilio, Marcio Pereira
    In the realm of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems, the selection of a weighting method holds a critical role. Researchers from diverse fields have consistently employed MCDM techniques, utilizing both traditional and novel methods to enhance the discipline. Acknowledging the significance of staying abreast of such methodological developments, this study endeavors to contribute to the field through a comprehensive review of several novel weighting-based methods: CILOS, IDOCRIW, FUCOM, LBWA, SAPEVO-M, and MEREC. Each method is scrutinized in terms of its characteristics and steps while also drawing upon publications extracted from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases. Through bibliometric and content analyses, this study delves into the trend, research components (sources, authors, countries, and affiliations), application areas, fuzzy implementations, hybrid studies (use of other weighting and/or ranking methods), and application tools for these methods. The findings of this review offer an insightful portrayal of the applications of each novel weighting method, thereby contributing valuable knowledge for researchers and practitioners within the field of MCDM.