Mimarlık Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1947
Browse
35 results
Search Results
Book Sacred Spaces and Urban Networks(ANAMED, 2019) Uğurlu, Ayşe Hilal; Yalman, Suzan; Uğurlu, Ayşe HilalWith its history that goes back millennia, Anatolia is studded with sites from different eras that are deemed “sacred.” The collected essays in this volume present diachronic and synchronic studies of Anatolian sacred sites from the medieval period onward that situate them within various spatial, urban, and sociocultural dynamics. Each article explores unique case studies that illustrate the role of human agency in the creative process of transforming awe-inspiring sites into sacred spaces. Collectively, the volume reveals that the magnetic qualities of such destinations create a web of sanctity, as well as a complicated matrix of economic, political, and social relations. The scholarly contributions published here emerged from the 11th International ANAMED Annual symposium, entitled “Sacred Spaces + Urban Networks” and held at Istanbul’s Koç University Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations (ANAMED) in December 2016. This symposium brought together prominent scholars in the field and former fellows of the research center, including the volume’s editors. While our initial goal was to explore different layers of sacredness in Anatolia, ultimately, the volume sheds light on parallels among case studies and presents the connectedness between these layers.Book Part Design-Build Build/Design: an Inquiry-Based Approach To Teaching Beginning Design Students(Taylor and Francis, 2018) Subotincic, NatalijaThis chapter describes an alternate design studio approach that eschews the concept first pedagogy universally adopted in design studio education, avoiding the resulting trap of the seemingly endless formal manipulations that all too often displace the more inclusive material and technical development of a design. The introduction of "design-build" studios and programs into the academic architectural curricula of many schools worldwide reflects recognition of the unhealthy and artificial separation made between design studio culture and the content of technical courses and constitutes an important way of bridging this self-imposed gap. Preserving the simultaneity of concerns and relationships during the design process, although difficult, is rather crucial to an "inquiry-based" approach to learning. When beginning design students start a project without a particular building system in mind, they tend to flounder with respect to design decisions about the tectonic constraints and technical/constructional possibilities of their designs. © 2019 Taylor and Francis.Conference Object A Design-Build Studio: Kilyos Boathouse [2019](TU Delft Open, 2019) Aydemir, Ayşe Zeynep; Sezgin, Ahmet; İnceoğlu, ArdaAs a part of stated curriculum of MEF University Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, design-build studio is a compulsory summer internship for the students completing their first year in architecture and interior design. Within the framework of the design-build studio, the school communicates its set of values through emphasising learning by doing, implying horizontal learning and underlining the process. This paper will discuss how a design-build studio can be a distinctive subliminal quality of an architecture faculty through the case of Boathouse project conducted during Summer 2018.Boathouse Project is designed and built at Kilyos Beach in Istanbul by the students completing their first year in architecture and interior design for Boun Marine and Sailing Club to store their equipment such as small sailing catamarans and windsurf boards while providing a space for club members to gather. Thirty-five first-year students, four second and third- year student assistants and three tutors designed and built the project for five weeks with the support by Boğaziçi University for materials and accommodation; ZETAS for ground works; and TORID for timber supply. Boun Marine and Sailing Club members also provided voluntary support for logistics and finishing. Boathouse is awarded both for the Turkish Architecture Yearbook 2018 and Project Awards for Architectural Students in Turkey.One of the most distinctive aspects of the project is learning by doing. Direct engagement enables learning through several processes, and design-build studio is a relevant setting to enhance them. In this context, students grew away from the formal setting and relocated in an unfamiliar context to confront with a real world subject. They were responsible with developing a fully-fledged design proposal, making presentations to communicate with the client, keeping working setup in order as well as the building site, tracking material supply, and building the design in a limited timeframe. Students used woodworking tools after having health and safety training and they undertake the shared work items as workgroups each day.The second aspect of the project is horizontal learning. Instead of delivering top-down instructions, educators’ position was ruling out the hierarchy by working, living and making decisions together. In this sense, working setting was an extension of the studio culture, including sex equality among work sharing, team set-up, and dedication to the project. Moreover, each student was responsible for their work items as well as they were responsible to the whole group. Student assistants were exchanging their experience and knowledge with the first-years while they were sharing the responsibility. They were learning from each other.The third aspect is underlining the process of the project. Within a limited timeframe and limited experience, the process is always emphasised considerably more than the final product. In this context, openness was one of the crucial characteristics that led a direct dialogue with the client through a series of meetings with the Boun Marine and Sailing Club members for developing the design together. During the building phase last- ing three weeks, several adaptations were made as responses to challenges and opportunities.Design-build studio is one of the central characteristics of the school. As a common experience, all of the students get involved in this organisation as early as the first-year; and they become a part of the faculty culture. Participation of all of the tutors in design-build studios also provides an introduction for a mutual acquaintance among students and tutors. Moreover, projects include a social aspect either for community service or for community involvement enhancing the purposefulness which then empower the connection with the real life situations. Overall, the design-build studio setting is a unique subliminal quality for architectural education besides its well-known curricular qualities.Research Project Cami Tasarımı Fikir Yarışması, Proje (1000 Kişilik)(Arkitera, 2019) Erdoğdu Özdemir, Elif; Özdemir, Kürşad; Uğurlu, Hilal; Yalman, Suzan; Songür, Serdar; Öztürk, Taha ErdemYarışmaya sunulan 1000 kişilik şehir merkez camisi tasarımı kentsel dokudan bir parçayı temsil eder. Geleneksel Güneydoğu kenti mekansal örüntüsüne uygun olarak içinde duvarlar, avlular, geçitler, gölgeli boşluklar barındırır. Merkezde yükselen ibadet yapısı saflar yönünde uzamış yatay bir plana sahiptir. Bölgenin kültürüne uygun bir geometrisi vardır.Cami, kent dokusuna boşlukları, ölçeği ve geçişleri ile entegre olur. Geleneksel mimariden aktarılan mekansal ve yapısal öğeler doku uyumuna katkıda bulunur.Book Part The Role of ‘sacreds’ in the Political Agenda of the ‘reformist’ Ottoman Sultan Selim Iii (r. 1789-1807)(ANAMED, 2019) Ayşe Hilal Uğurlu; Yalman, Suzan; Ayşe Hilal UğurluSelim III was enthroned at a time when the central authority and image of the sultan was gradually weakening due to the Ottoman-Russian wars during most of the second half of the eighteenth century (1768-74, 1787-92) that emotionally and financially strained the empire. The number of military and political setbacks during his reign, brought about the questioning of both the extensive new order that was trying to be implimented as well as the legitimacy of the sultan himself. The escalating turmoil in the Arabian peninsula caused by the continued expansion of the Wahhabi-Saudi state after 1790’s, especially their disruption of the annual hajj and occupying Mecca in 1803, also effected Selim’s prestige as the defender of Islam and “the servant of the two noble sanctuaries” (hadim ul-haremeyn ül-şerifeyn) [Mecca&Medina]. This paper aims to examine the efforts of Selim III - who is commonly known with his reforms in areas such as the military, economy, trade, politics, and diplomacy- to counteract the weakening image of his religious leadership in the eyes of Istanbul residents through a case study of the reconstruction of the Eyüp Sultan Mosque.Book Part Müceddid” Osmanlı Sultanı III.Selim’in Siyasi Söyleminde “Kutsalların” Rolü(ANAMED Yayınları, 2019) Uğurlu, Ayşe Hilal; Uğurlu, Ayşe Hilal; Yalman, SuzanIII.Selim, onsekizinci yüzyılın ikinci yarısının büyük kısmında devam eden (1768-74, 1787-92) Osmanlı - Rus savaşlarının maddî-mânevî yıprattığı imparatorlukta, merkezî otoritenin ve hükümdarlık imajının günden güne zayıfladığı bir dönemde tahta çıkar. Tahta çıktığında kendisine büyük ümitler atfedilen III.Selim’in saltanatı boyunca yaşanan pek çok askeri - siyasi başarısızlık, hem oluşturulmaya çalışılan kapsamlı ve yeni düzenin, hem de bizzat padişahın meşruiyetlerini sorgulanır hale getirir. Vahhabi-Saudi devletinin devam eden genişlemesi, özellikle hac yolunu engellemeleri ve 1803 yılında Mekke’yi işgal etmeleri gibi Arap yarımadasında artan karışıklıklar da Selim’in islamın savunucusu ve hadim ul-haremeyn ül-şerifeyn olarak imajını olumsuz yönde etkiler.Bu çalışma, daha çok askeriye, iktisat, ticaret, siyaset, diplomasi gibi pek çok alanda düzenlemelere gitmiş bir reformist olarak ele alınan III. Selim’in, İstanbul halkının gözünde dini liderlik imajının zayıflamasını engellemeye yönelik faaliyetlerini incelemeyi ve Eyüp Sultan Camiinin yeniden inşası özelinde bu çabaları bütüncül olarak anlamlandırmayı hedeflemektedir.Article Kent Mekanında Mikro Özgürlük Alanları(2014) Arda İnceoğlu; Tuğçe Şahin; Şahin, Tuğçe; İnceoğlu, ArdaBu makalede bir bölümü sunulan çalışmanın amacı, bir kentli olarak kentteki mevcudiyetimizi, kent mekanının mekansal ve yaşantısal olasılıklarının keşfini ve mevcut düzen ve yaşantıya alternatif olarak üretilen mekanları anlamaktır. Bunun yanı sıra, kentlinin gündelik eylemleri sırasında kentte keşfettiği mekanlarla birlikte, ürettiği mikro mekanlara odaklanılmaktadır. Çalışmada, İstanbul ve Ankara şehirlerinden konuya örnek teşkil edecek durumlar ile bir envanter oluşturma yol gidilmiştir. Oluşturulan envanterde yedi katman bulunmaktadır. Bu katmanlar mikro özgürlük alanının kullandığı kent mekanı, nasıl bir alternatif kullanım (kullanım saptırma) ortaya koyduğu, bunu yaparken hangi eylemi kullandığı, aktörlerin kimler olduğu, eylemin anlık ya da sürekli olup olmadığı ve eylemin gerçekleştirme biçiminin planlı ya da kendiliğinden gelişmesi şeklindedir. Bu makalede ise, envanterdeki İstanbul örneklerine odaklanılarak, `mikro özgürlük alanları’ ile ne anlatılmak istendiği, İstanbul’da bu kavrama denk düşen alternatif kullanımların neler olduğu, kent mekanları ve bu alternatif mekanların kent hafızasına nasıl yerleştiği üzerinde durulmaktadır. Envanterdeki yedi katman ile beraber her örneğin mekan, zaman, kullanım ve eylem katmanlarında nasıl yeni durumlar oluşturduğu birlikte görülmektedir.Research Project G.ü.l.l.e İnsansız Otonom Sualtı Aracı(Savunma Sanayi Başkanlığı, 2018) Özdemir, KürşadKürşad Özdemir liderliğindeki MEF Üniversitesi Sanat Tasarım ve Mimarlık Fakültesi mezun öğrencilerinin de yer aldığı G.Ü.L.L.E takımı, Savunma Sanayi Başkanlığı tarafından düzenlenen “İnsansız/Otonom Deniz Sistemleri Endüstriyel Tasarım Yarışması”nda birincilik ödülünü almıştır.Book Part Book Part