Hukuk Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1935
Browse
7 results
Search Results
Master Term Project Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi içtihadı ışığında sanatsal ifade özgürlüğü(Galatasaray Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kamu Hukuku Anabilim Dalı, 2017) Kejanlıoğlu, Atagün Mert; Çelik, Demirhan BurakSanatsal ifade özgürlüğü Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi (AİHM) kararlarında ifade özgürlüğünü koruyan 10. madde kapsamında korunan bir özgürlüktür. Bu durum bu özgürlüğe özel olarak adanmış çalışmaların sayısını azaltmasına neden olmaktadır. Ayrıca özgürlüğün sınırlarını kesin olarak belirlemek zordur; çünkü sanatın tanımı üzerinde uzlaşma yoktur. Bu doğrultuda, Mahkemenin geliştirdiği korumanın sanat için yeterince koruyucu bir alan sağlayıp sağlamadığını göstermek için, sanatın ne olduğu ve nitelikleri tartışılacaktır. Bununla birlikte bu özgürlüğün kapsamı açıklanacak, bu kapsamın nasıl sınırlandığı ve AİHM'in yaklaşımının sanatın gereklerine uygun olup olmadığı ise AİHM içtihadındaki takdir marjı doktrini ışığında incelenecektir.Article Ucu açık bir Gerrymandering hikâyesi(Manifesto Medya Basın Yayın Tic. Ltd. Şti., 2019) Kejanlıoğlu, Atagün MertBu makale Yüksek Seçim Kurulu'nun Bursa şehrinin iki seçim çevresine bölünmesi hakkındaki kararının bir gerrymandering örneği olup olmadığını ve bu kararın Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi'ne aykırılığını tartışmaktadır.Article Başkanlık anayasaları - 4: Türk tipi başkanlık sistemi(Doğan Burda Dergi Yayıncılık ve Pazarlama A.Ş., 2017) Çelik, Demirhan Burak; Alkış, Burcu; Kejanlıoğlu, Atagün MertThis article discusses how the presidential system featured in 2017 Turkish constitutional amendments fails to establish an effective separation of powers that would protect democracy and human rights.Article Başkanlık anayasaları - 3: Azerbaycan anayasası(Doğan Burda Dergi Yayıncılık ve Pazarlama A.Ş., 2017) Çelik, Demirhan Burak; Alkış, Burcu; Kejanlıoğlu, Atagün MertThis article explains the presidential system of Azerbaijan by offering a brief historical and political context. It concentrates on how the Constitution fails to establish an effective separation of powers.Article Başkanlık anayasaları 1: ABD anayasası(Doğan Burda Dergi Yayıncılık ve Pazarlama A.Ş., 2016) Çelik, Demirhan Burak; Alkış, Burcu; Kejanlıoğlu, Atagün MertThe article explains main features of the presidential system of the United States by offering a brief historical and political context and concentrating on how it manages to maintain separation of powers.Conference Object The Unconstitutional ‘semi-Presidentialism’ in France and Turkey: How Does Popular Consent Enable Presidents To Abuse Power?(2017) Kejanlıoğlu, Atagün MertWhen Maurice Duverger wrote his article on semi-presidential systems, hewas aiming to defy the binary approach stuck between presidential and parliamentaryform of government. However, the category and its definition are still contested.Despite the debate around the concept, France remains an archetype to this form ofgovernment for majority of scholars. When Duverger classified France as an exampleof semi-presidential government and a country with all-powerful presidency, hepointed out merely four cases of unconstitutional use of powers and concluded thatthe consent of Prime Ministers enabled the transfer of powers to the President. Yet, asthe French cohabitation experience proved, Article 21 of the Constitution statesclearly that the head of government is not the President of Republic but the PrimeMinister and the consent of Prime Minister does not clear the unconstitutional natureof this transfer of power. The French experience of semi-presidentialism is aparticular example to compare with Turkey in this sense, as Turkey’s currentPresident is the first President that has been popularly elected, and de facto transfer ofPrime Minister’s powers to the President is a gradual and continuing phenomenonwithin the system. I argue that implementing a popularly elected president to aconstitution originally designed for a rationalized parliamentary regime creates a riskregarding the abuse of presidential power. To this aim, the transformation of Turkishand French systems will be analyzed not only in a strictly legal perspective but alsowithin the historical and political circumstances surrounding the election of firstpopularly elected Presidents.Master Term Project Le Président de la République dans les systèmes politiques turc et français(University of Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne, 2016) Kejanlıoğlu, Atagün MertThe President of Republic is becoming the central figure of the political system compared to the Prime Minister in Turkey, as it is in France, primarily as a result of the constitutional amendments regarding the election of the President of Republic by universal suffrage. However, French and Turkish Constitutions contain elements necessary to qualify these regimes as parliamentary. Both in Turkey and in France, the President of Republic has considerably important powers compared to classical parliamentary regimes as the President is entitled to use some of its powers without the counter signature of the Prime Minister. This, albeit crucial, is not enough to explain the role of the President of Republic within these political regimes. By distinguishing the political regime - defined as the regime established by the Constitution - and the political system - defined as the system that appears in practice - we are able to offer a more detailed insight to the predominance of the President in these systems. In this vein, the submission of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet to the President, and the weakening of the Parliament will be studied within the “system of determining variables” proposed by Professor Marie-Anne Cohendet. The analysis will focus on issues such as the legitimacy of the President gained by universal suffrage, the election calendar, electoral system, party systems, traditions, and historical background behind the Constitutions and amendments.