Ekonomi Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1936
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Article Citation - WoS: 6Citation - Scopus: 5The Economic Impact of Symptomatic Menopause Among Low-Socioeconomic Women in the United States(Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2015-08-02) Başer, Onur; Keshishian, A; Xie, Lin; Wang, YuexiBackground: Menopausal symptoms have a significant negative impact on patient's quality of life and increase healthcare costs among women. Methods: This retrospective analysis used data from a U.S. national database (01 January 2008-31 December 2010). Patients with a diagnosis of menopause symptoms or a prescription claim for hormone therapy were matched to control patients. Healthcare resource utilization and costs during the 6-month follow-up period were compared. Generalized linear models were used to adjust for differences in baseline and demographic characteristics between the cohorts. Results: A total of 71,076 patients were included in each cohort. Patients with menopausal symptoms were more likely to have depression and anxiety and incurred significantly higher follow-up healthcare costs ($7237 vs $6739, p < 0.001) and healthcare utilization during the 6-month follow-up period. Conclusion: Patients diagnosed with menopausal symptoms or treated with hormone therapy incurred significantly higher healthcare costs than those without menopausal symptoms or treatment.Conference Object Citation - WoS: 9Citation - Scopus: 11A Value-Adding Approach To Reliability Under Preventive Maintenance Costs and Its Applications(Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2014-05-12) Dubey, Rameshwar; Kılıç, Erdem; Ali, Sadia Samar; Weber, Gerhard WilhelmNo equipment (system) can be perfectly reliable in spite of the utmost care and best efforts on the part of the designer, decision-maker and manufacturer. The two sides of maintenance are corrective and preventive maintenance. It is generally assumed that a preventive maintenance action is less costly than a repair maintenance action. We examine this proposition in detail on the basis of a failure-time model that relates conformance quality to reliability. Illustratively, we present reliability in the context of contracts with asymmetric information. The model shows how to overcome information rents through price distortions and quantity rationing. The paper ends with a conclusion and an outlook to future studies.Article Citation - WoS: 60Citation - Scopus: 60Risk of Stroke/Systemic Embolism, Major Bleeding and Associated Costs in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Who Initiated Apixaban, Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban Compared With Warfarin in the United States Medicare Population(Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2017-07-11) Amin, Alpesh; Lien Vo; Trocio, Jeffrey; Keshishian, A; Liu, Xianchen; Mardekian, Jack; Zhang, Qisu; Rosenblatt, Lisa; Dina, Oluwaseyi; Başer, Onur; Le, Hannah; Vo, LienObjective: To compare the risk and cost of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding between each direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and warfarin among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Methods: Patients (65 years) initiating warfarin or DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) were selected from the Medicare database from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2014. Patients initiating each DOAC were matched 1:1 to warfarin patients using propensity score matching to balance demographics and clinical characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risks of stroke/SE and major bleeding of each DOAC vs. warfarin. Two-part models were used to compare the stroke/SE- and major-bleeding-related medical costs between matched cohorts. Results: Of the 186,132 eligible patients, 20,803 apixaban-warfarin pairs, 52,476 rivaroxaban-warfarin pairs, and 16,731 dabigatran-warfarin pairs were matched. Apixaban (hazard ratio [HR]=0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31, 0.53) and rivaroxaban (HR=0.72; 95% CI 0.63, 0.83) were significantly associated with lower risk of stroke/SE compared to warfarin. Apixaban (HR=0.51; 95% CI 0.44, 0.58) and dabigatran (HR=0.79; 95% CI 0.69, 0.91) were significantly associated with lower risk of major bleeding; rivaroxaban (HR=1.17; 95% CI 1.10, 1.26) was significantly associated with higher risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin. Compared to warfarin, apixaban ($63 vs. $131) and rivaroxaban ($93 vs. $139) had significantly lower stroke/SE-related medical costs; apixaban ($292 vs. $529) and dabigatran ($369 vs. $450) had significantly lower major bleeding-related medical costs. Conclusions: Among the DOACs in the study, only apixaban is associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding and lower related medical costs compared to warfarin.