Okuyan, Mukadder

Loading...
Profile Picture
Name Variants
Job Title
Email Address
Main Affiliation
04.02. Department of Psychology
Status
Former Staff
Website
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
Documents

8

Citations

120

Scholarly Output

2

Articles

2

Views / Downloads

406/54

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

7

Scopus Citation Count

7

WoS h-index

2

Scopus h-index

2

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

3.50

Scopus Citations per Publication

3.50

Open Access Source

0

Supervised Theses

0

JournalCount
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy1
Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 2
    Citation - Scopus: 2
    Majority Grievance in Germany: the Role of Entitlement Beliefs and Ingroup Threat
    (Educational Publishing Foundation-american Psychological Assoc, 2023) Stucke, Frederike; Okuyan, Mukadder; Loreth, Lukas
    Group-based grievance has mainly been studied from the perspective of disadvantaged and minority groups. Following the refugee crisis and corresponding sociopolitical changes, there has also been an increase in perceived grievance among majority groups in many European countries. The present studies examined the role of perceived threat in the relationship between autochthony-based entitlement and group grievances among members of the German majority. Across three correlational studies, we tested whether threat moderates versus mediates this relationship. In Study 1, using a nationally representative sample, we found support for threat serving as a mediator of the relationship between autochthony-based entitlement and majority grievance. We replicated this finding in Studies 2 (N = 380) and 3 (N = 614) using convenience samples. We discuss the diverse roles played by perceived threat in predicting defensive reactions by majority groups and the importance of studying perceived entitlement in majority groups' grievance claims.
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 5
    Citation - Scopus: 5
    What Predicts Perceived Discrimination Among White Americans? Findings From Two Nationally Representative Studies
    (Wiley, 2023) Vollhardt, Johanna Ray; Okuyan, Mukadder; Stewart, Andrew
    Many national or racial majority groups increasingly perceive discrimination against their group, despite objective indicators of advantage. The present studies simultaneously test three individual-level explanations of perceived discrimination among White Americans: system legitimizing beliefs, economic precarity, and group interest, in addition to corresponding predictors at the context (state) level. Using multilevel analysis, we analyzed nationally-representative data from the 2016 American National Election Survey (N = 2631)-an election period marked by discourse about majority group grievances. Results showed that, at the individual level, system-legitimizing beliefs (symbolic racism, conservatism, realistic, and symbolic threat) predicted perceived discrimination among Whites, as did objective (income) and subjective (perceived financial insecurity) economic precarity. Conversely, group interest (indicated by White racial identification) was not a significant predictor. At the state level, support for the Republican candidate also predicted perceived discrimination. These findings replicated with data from the 2012 American National Election Survey (N = 3261). We discuss the implications of White Americans' discrimination claims in the current socio-political climate.