Tepe Çomoğlu, Beyza

Loading...
Profile Picture
Name Variants
Tepe, B.
Job Title
Email Address
tepebe@mef.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
04.02. Department of Psychology
Status
Current Staff
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

1

Research Products
Documents

11

Citations

115

h-index

7

Documents

14

Citations

116

Scholarly Output

1

Articles

1

Views / Downloads

8/0

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

0

Scopus Citation Count

0

WoS h-index

0

Scopus h-index

0

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

0.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

0.00

Open Access Source

0

Supervised Theses

0

Google Analytics Visitor Traffic

JournalCount
Journal of Environmental Psychology1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Article
    Moral Framing Effects on Environmental Attitudes: A Conceptual Replication and Extension of Feinberg and Willer (2013)
    (Academic Press Ltd- Elsevier Science Ltd, 2025) Cavdar, Dilara; Tepe, Beyza; Saribay, S. Adil; Yilmaz, Onurcan
    This study investigates the relationship between moral framing, political orientation, and pro-environmental attitudes, replicating and extending Feinberg and Willer (2013) in a non-Western context. Using a Turkish-speaking sample (N = 699), we examined the effectiveness of care and sanctity-framed messages and the moderating role of actively open-minded thinking (AOT). Our findings partially replicated the original study. Sanctity framing increased pro-environmental attitudes among conservatives, while care framing had no significant effect. Political conservatism was negatively associated with pro-environmental attitudes, confirming prior findings. Exploratory analyses revealed that AOT moderated the effects of sanctity framing on environmental attitudes, with individuals low or moderate in AOT being more responsive. Both care and sanctity frames increased environmental donation, addressing the intention-behavior gap. However, cultural nuances, such as the collectivist orientation of the sample, may have influenced the care frame's ineffectiveness. The study highlights the importance of cultural context in moral framing research and underscores the need for context-specific climate communication strategies.