Borders of socio-economic development in Türkiye
Loading...
Date
2024
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu Vakfı
Open Access Color
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Abstract
Turkish economy is characterized by a dual regional structure. Historically, western regions form the relatively more developed and rich geography of the country. In the meantime, landlocked eastern regions are realizing a period of marginalization pushing majority of these regions toward full isolation from rest of the country. Our knowledge on this dual pattern departs mostly from monetary indicators. In this study, I use the socio-economic development index (SDI) which is first constructed by the State Planning Organization (SPO). The main objective is to use spatial tools for the period of 1963-2017 and to explore the historical evolution of spatial externalities and heterogeneity. This aims to visualize the socio-economic borders of Turkish provinces. While our findings confirm the spatial inertia for the under-developed eastern regions, they also show rising spatial spillovers among the developed western geography. However, this positive impact is geographically bounded by the central part of the country.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
socio-economic development, regional inequality, Türkiye
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
Karahasan, B. C. (2024). Borders of Socio-Economic Development in Türkiye. Ekonomi-Tek, 13(2), pp.183-197.
WoS Q
Scopus Q
Source
Ekonomi-TEK
Volume
13
Issue
2
Start Page
183
End Page
197
Collections
Google Scholar™
Sustainable Development Goals
1
NO POVERTY

2
ZERO HUNGER

3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

4
QUALITY EDUCATION

5
GENDER EQUALITY

6
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION

7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY

8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES

11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES

12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION

13
CLIMATE ACTION

14
LIFE BELOW WATER

15
LIFE ON LAND

16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS

17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
