Qubo Formulations and Characterization of Penalty Parameters for the Multi-Knapsack Problem

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2025

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

IEEE-Inst Electrical Electronics Engineers Inc

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

The Multi-Knapsack Problem (MKP) is a fundamental challenge in operations research and combinatorial optimization. Quantum computing introduces new possibilities for solving MKP using Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models. However, a key challenge in QUBO formulations is the selection of penalty parameters, which directly influence solution feasibility and algorithm performance. In this work, we develop QUBO formulations for two MKP variants-the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem (MDKP) and the Multiple Knapsack Problem (MUKP)-and provide an algebraic characterization of their penalty parameters. We systematically evaluate their impact through quantum simulation experiments and compare the performance of the two leading quantum optimization approaches: Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and quantum annealing, alongside a state-of-the-art classical solver. Our results indicate that while classical solvers remain superior, careful tuning of penalty parameters has a strong impact on quantum optimization outcomes. QAOA is highly sensitive to parameter choices, whereas quantum annealing produces more stable results on small to mid-sized instances. Further, our results reveal that MDKP instances can maintain feasibility at penalty values below theoretical bounds, while MUKP instances show greater sensitivity to penalty reductions. Finally, we outline directions for future research in solving MKP, including adaptive penalty parameter tuning, hybrid quantum-classical approaches, and practical optimization strategies for QAOA, as well as real-hardware evaluations.

Description

Keywords

Optimization, Quantum Computing, Logic Gates, Quantum Annealing, Annealing, Qubit, Noise, Approximation Algorithms, Tuning, Quantum State, Multi-Dimensional Knapsack Problem, Multiple Knapsack Problem, Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization, Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm, Penalty Parameters, penalty parameters, 330 - Wirtschaft, multiple knapsack problem, quantum annealing, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, Multi-dimensional knapsack problem, quadratic unconstrained binary optimization, quantum approximate optimization algorithm, TK1-9971

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q2

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

IEEE Access

Volume

13

Issue

Start Page

47086

End Page

47098
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 1

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 2

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
10.83069519

Sustainable Development Goals

1

NO POVERTY
NO POVERTY Logo

2

ZERO HUNGER
ZERO HUNGER Logo

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

4

QUALITY EDUCATION
QUALITY EDUCATION Logo

5

GENDER EQUALITY
GENDER EQUALITY Logo

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

13

CLIMATE ACTION
CLIMATE ACTION Logo

14

LIFE BELOW WATER
LIFE BELOW WATER Logo

15

LIFE ON LAND
LIFE ON LAND Logo

16

PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS Logo

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo