Warning Notes in a Learner’s Dictionary: a Study of the Effectiveness of Different Formats
Loading...
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
International Journal of Lexicography
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This study used an online correction task to explore the extent to which different types of warning notes in Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online were heeded when users tried to correct errors in the use of L2 target words. The task was completed by 332 participants, yielding 1,819 answers produced after clicking on links to relevant entries. Warning notes were categorised in terms of their formatting features, but there were found to be inconsistencies in the way the dictionary associated different categories with different kinds of learner error. Participants judged warning notes with more visual enhancements to be more useful, but in the correction task the position of the warning notes also seemed to affect the degree to which the warnings were successfully applied. Different types of warning notes in learners’ dictionaries have not been examined previously in any depth, and the results suggest that some adjustments to formatting and placement might make them more effective.
Description
Keywords
Warning notes, Noticing, Typographical features, Error correction, Dictionary use, Typographical features, Noticing, Warning notes, Error correction, Dictionary use
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
0602 languages and literature, 05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, 06 humanities and the arts
Citation
Nesi, H., Nural, Ş., & Çakar, T. (25 January 2022). Warning Notes in a Learner’s Dictionary: A Study of the Effectiveness of Different Formats. International Journal of Lexicography, In-Press. pp. 1-19.
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
1
Source
International Journal of Lexicography
Volume
35
Issue
Start Page
1-19
End Page
467
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 4
SCOPUS™ Citations
2
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
2
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Page Views
241
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Downloads
4308
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™


