State Gun Control Laws, Gun Ownership and the Supply of Homicide Organ Donors
Loading...
Date
2020
Authors
Bilgel, Fırat
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
8
OpenAIRE Views
2
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The likelihood of being a potential deceased organ donor is higher for individuals who have been exposed to situations typically characterized by a severe head trauma or stroke that result in brain death. Employing count data models that account for overdispersion and/or excessive counts of zeros, this paper assesses the unintended consequences of enforcing stricter gun control laws and the effects of gun ownership on homicide organ donor supply in the United States using county data for the period 2009–2015. The findings confirm the transplantation paradox hypothesis that stricter gun control laws reduce the expected cases of gun homicides and thereby reduce deceased organ donor supply and exacerbate the organ shortage. The findings are robust to several measures of the strength of gun control laws, restricted samples and spurious outcome variables. However, the direction of the impact of gun ownership levels on homicide organ donor supply proved to be inconclusive.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Negative binomial, Organ donation, State gun control laws, Homicide, Overdispersion, Economics and Econometrics, Law, Finance
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences
Citation
Bilgel, F. (September 01, 2020). State Gun Control Laws, Gun Ownership and the Supply of Homicide Organ Donors. International Review of Law & Economics, 63.
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
International Review of Law and Economics
Volume
63
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 14

OpenAlex FWCI
0.0
Sustainable Development Goals
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS


