Physicians’ Ethical Concerns About Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: a Qualitative Study: “the Final Decision Should Rest With a Human”
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Background/aim: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the capability of computational systems to perform tasks that require human-like cognitive functions, such as reasoning, learning, and decision-making. Unlike human intelligence, AI does not involve sentience or consciousness but focuses on data processing, pattern recognition, and prediction through algorithms and learned experiences. In healthcare including neuroscience, AI is valuable for improving prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and surveillance. Methods: This qualitative study aimed to investigate the acceptability of AI in Medicine (AIIM) and to elucidate any technical and scientific, as well as social and ethical issues involved. Twenty-five doctors from various specialties were carefully interviewed regarding their views, experience, knowledge, and attitude toward AI in healthcare. Results: Content analysis confirmed the key ethical principles involved: confidentiality, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Honesty was the least invoked principle. A thematic analysis established four salient topic areas, i.e., advantages, risks, restrictions, and precautions. Alongside the advantages, there were many limitations and risks. The study revealed a perceived need for precautions to be embedded in healthcare policies to counter the risks discussed. These precautions need to be multi-dimensional. Conclusion: The authors conclude that AI should be rationally guided, function transparently, and produce impartial results. It should assist human healthcare professionals collaboratively. This kind of AI will permit fairer, more innovative healthcare which benefits patients and society whilst preserving human dignity. It can foster accuracy and precision in medical practice and reduce the workload by assisting physicians during clinical tasks. AIIM that functions transparently and respects the public interest can be an inspiring scientific innovation for humanity. Copyright © 2024 Kahraman, Aktas, Bayrakceken, Çakar, Tarcan, Bayram, Durak and Ulman.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Decision-Making, Ethics, Healthcare, Medicine, Qualitative Research, Male, Adult, medicine, Attitude of Health Personnel, Decision Making, healthcare, decision-making, Middle Aged, artificial intelligence, ethics, Artificial Intelligence, Physicians, Humans, Female, Ethics, Medical, Public Health, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270, qualitative research, Qualitative Research
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
0301 basic medicine, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Frontiers in Public Health
Volume
12
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 10
PubMed : 5
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 34
SCOPUS™ Citations
10
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
9
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Page Views
220
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™


