Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1300
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBirgili, Bengi-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-07T14:34:54Z
dc.date.available2020-02-07T14:34:54Z
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationBirgili, B., (December 20, 2019) Comparative Reflection on Best Known Instructional Design Models: Notes from the Field. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning: (6), 1. pp. 78-94.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1300-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol6/iss1/5-
dc.description.abstractInstructional design is a systematic, reflective process in which instructional principles are applied into teaching and learning plans via the differentiation of materials, activities, resources and evaluation (Smith & Ragan, 2004; Morrison, Ross & Kemp, 2001). In this systematic process, instructional design tasks include analysis of knowledge and skills, of concepts, and the design of the learning environment with evaluation of learning outcomes. An instructional design model provides information regarding how to develop instructive programs in line with appropriate learning theories and prescribes how to teach content effectively (Dijkstra, 1997, 2001). Instructional design (ID), in other words, helps instructors or teachers visualize the instructional problems they will likely encounter during the education experience by breaking down learning occasions into discrete and practicable units so that instructors and teachers can analyse and adapt instruction systematically. In addition, the instructional design process requires that designers know and inquire about theories of learning, systematic analysis of learners, management techniques, and the ability to use information technology efficiently.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Massachusetts Bostonen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Issues in Emerging eLearningen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectcurriculum and instructionen_US
dc.subjectDick and Carey modelen_US
dc.subjectKemp modelen_US
dc.subjectinstructional designen_US
dc.subjectPosner course designen_US
dc.subjectSmith and Ragan modelen_US
dc.titleComparative reflection on best known instructional design models: notes from the fielden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.authoridBengi Birgili / 0000-0002-2990-6717-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.endpage94en_US
dc.identifier.startpage78en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.departmentEğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Bölümüen_US
dc.institutionauthorBirgili, Bengi-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.dept04.04. Department of Political Science and International Relations-
Appears in Collections:İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Koleksiyonu
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparative Reflection on Best Known Instructional Design Models_.pdfYayıncı Sürümü - Makale444.21 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

6
checked on Jun 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.