Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/633
Title: Pcn62 - Assessing the Economic Burden and Health Care Resource Utilizations of Us Medica Re Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Authors: Keshishian, A
Du, J
Xie, L
Başer, Onur
Source: Xie, L., Keshishian, A., Du, J.& Baser, O.(2015). Assessing The Economic Burden And Health Care Resource Utilizations Of Us Medica Re Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Value in Health. 18, 3. p.200.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To examine the economic burden and health care resource utilization of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) in the U.S. Medicare population. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was performed using the U.S.national Medicare claims from January 2008 through December 2012. MPN patientswere identified using International Classification of Disease 9th Revision ClinicalModification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes 238.4, 238.71, 238.76 and 289.83. The diagnosis date was designated as the index date. A comparison cohort without a MPNdiagnosis was created for patients of the same age, region, gender, index year andbaseline Charlson Comorbidity Index score. A random index date was chosen forthe comparison cohort to reduce selection bias. Patients were required to havecontinuous medical and pharmacy benefits 1 year pre- and post-index date. Oneto-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare follow-uphealth care costs and utilizations between the cohorts, adjusting for demographicand clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Eligible patients (N=17,950) were identifiedfor the MPN and comparison cohorts. After 1:1 PSM, a total of 5,546 patients werematched from each cohort and baseline characteristics were well-balanced. MPNpatients had a higher percentage of health care resource utilizations, includingMedicare carrier (98.6% vs. 65.9%), Durable Medical Equipment (DME; 29.5% vs.14.4%), Home Health Agency (HHA; 12.4% vs. 5.0%), outpatient visits (76.6% vs.37.4%), inpatient hospitalizations (27.2% vs. 6.8%) and Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF;7.5% vs. 2.0%) visits than non-MPN patients. Patients diagnosed with MPNs alsoincurred significantly higher costs, including Medicare carrier ($3,872 vs. $1,283),DME ($266 vs. $91), HHA ($639 vs. $250), outpatient ($10,061 vs. $3,204), inpatient($5,449 vs. $1,054), pharmacy ($1,069 vs. $713) and total health care costs ($23,060vs. $7,076; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: MPN patients had a higher burden of illnesscompared to non-MPN patients.
Description: Onur Başer (MEF Author)
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/633
ISSN: 1098-3015
1524-4733
Appears in Collections:Ekonomi Bölümü Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WOS000354498503180.pdf
  Until 2089-02-11
Konferans Dosyası48.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

20
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.