Pmh21 - Comparing the Healthcare Utilization and Costs of Early- and Late-Stage Alzheimer's Disease Patients Residing in Long-Term Care Facilities

dc.contributor.author Xie, L.
dc.contributor.author Keshishian, A
dc.contributor.author Wang, Y.
dc.contributor.author Başer, Onur
dc.date.accessioned 2019-02-28T13:04:26Z
dc.date.accessioned 2019-02-28T11:08:14Z
dc.date.available 2019-02-28T13:04:26Z
dc.date.available 2019-02-28T11:08:14Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.description Onur Başer (MEF Author)
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVES: To compare healthcare utilization and costs between early- andlate-stage Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients residing in long-term care (LTC)facilities. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with AD (International Classification ofDiseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code 331.0) were identifiedusing U.S. Medicare claims linked with the Long-Term Care Minimum Data Set (MDS)from 01JULY2008 through 31DEC2010. The first diagnosis date was designated asthe index date. Patients were required to be age ?65 years, with continuous medicaland pharmacy benefits for 6 months pre- and post-index date, and reside in an LTCfacility. Patients were categorized as early- or late-stage. Late-stage AD was definedby a cognitive performance scale score ?5 (range 0-6) and Activities of Daily Livingshort-form activities score ?10 points. Patients with and without AD were matchedbased on demographic and clinical characteristics, and 1:1 propensity score matching was used to compare follow-up all-cause and AD-related healthcare costs andutilizations. RESULTS: Before matching, late-stage AD patients (n=5,323) were lesslikely to be white (83.0% vs. 86.4%), male (16.4% vs. 21.7%) and have comorbid conditions measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index score (3.55 vs. 4.83, p<0.001) thanearly-stage AD patients (n=20,023). After 1:1 matching, 3,804 patients were matchedfrom each cohort and baseline characteristics were balanced. Fewer late-stage ADpatients had skilled nursing facility admissions (25.3% vs. 29.8%, p<0.0001), but morehad hospice admissions (17.8% vs. 7.3%, p<0.0001) and pharmacy visits (85.8% vs.81.9%, p<0.0001) than early-stage AD patients. There were no significant differencesin total all-cause healthcare costs; however, late-stage AD patients incurred significantly higher disease-related total ($14,739 vs. $13,673, p=0.0242) and hospice costs($4,157 vs. $1,553, p<0.0001) compared to early-stage AD patients. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with late-stage AD incurred higher disease-related costs than those withearly-stage AD; however, there were no significant differences in total all-causehealthcare costs.
dc.identifier.citation Xie, L., Keshishian, A., Du, J. & Baser, O. (2015). Comparing the healthcare utilization and costs of early- and late-stage alzheimer's disease patients residing in long-term care facilities. Value in Health. 18, 3. p.118.
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.693
dc.identifier.issn 1098-3015
dc.identifier.issn 1524-4733
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/621
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.693
dc.language.iso en
dc.relation.ispartof Value in Health
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.title Pmh21 - Comparing the Healthcare Utilization and Costs of Early- and Late-Stage Alzheimer's Disease Patients Residing in Long-Term Care Facilities
dc.type Conference Object
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Başer, Onur
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::conference output
gdc.description.department İİSBF, Ekonomi Bölümü
gdc.description.endpage 118
gdc.description.issue 3
gdc.description.publicationcategory Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 118
gdc.description.volume 18
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded - Social Science Citation Index
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W2342890430
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000354498502036
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.oaire.accesstype HYBRID
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.5942106E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords Health Policy
gdc.oaire.keywords Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
gdc.oaire.popularity 8.5721724E-10
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 03 medical and health sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0302 clinical medicine
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0305 other medical science
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.27
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 6
gdc.publishedmonth Mayıs
gdc.virtual.author Başer, Onur
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
gdc.wos.collaboration Uluslararası işbirliği ile yapılan - EVET
gdc.wos.documenttype Meeting Abstract
gdc.wos.indexdate 2015
gdc.wos.publishedmonth Mayıs
gdc.yokperiod YÖK - 2014-15
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 6960b0ec-7a84-4e87-a091-3b9e22c72a9c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 6960b0ec-7a84-4e87-a091-3b9e22c72a9c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 5664fa6c-ff72-48d2-8431-5b401dcf7a5f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a6e60d5c-b0c7-474a-b49b-284dc710c078
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 5664fa6c-ff72-48d2-8431-5b401dcf7a5f

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Comparing the healthcare.pdf
Size:
52.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Konferans Dosyası

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: